From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Eggebrecht

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jan 14, 2016
NO. 9:14-CV-144 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2016)

Opinion

NO. 9:14-CV-144

01-14-2016

LAVORRIS JOHNSON, and MARVELL JOHNSON v. BRIAN EGGEBRECHT, and CITY OF NACOGDOCHES, TEXAS


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

This case was assigned to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, for all pretrial matters pursuant to General Order 14-10. Pending before the court is a joint "Motion for Summary Judgment" filed by the Defendants, Brian Eggebrecht and the City of Nacogdoches, Texas. (Doc. No. 15.) The magistrate judge filed a report recommending that the court grant the Defendants' motion in part and deny it in part. (Doc. No. 23.) No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and the time for doing so has passed. Furthermore, the court's independent review confirms that the magistrate judge's analysis is correct.

It is, therefore, ORDERED that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (Doc. No. 23) is ADOPTED; and the Defendants' "Motion for Summary Judgment" (Doc. No. 15) is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. SIGNED this 14th day of January, 2016.

/s/_________

MICHAEL H. SCHNEIDER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Johnson v. Eggebrecht

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION
Jan 14, 2016
NO. 9:14-CV-144 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2016)
Case details for

Johnson v. Eggebrecht

Case Details

Full title:LAVORRIS JOHNSON, and MARVELL JOHNSON v. BRIAN EGGEBRECHT, and CITY OF…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS LUFKIN DIVISION

Date published: Jan 14, 2016

Citations

NO. 9:14-CV-144 (E.D. Tex. Jan. 14, 2016)

Citing Cases

Wilcox v. McEvoy

“The plaintiff can defeat summary judgment by rebutting the qualified immunity defense as a matter of law or…

United States v. Glenn

Nonetheless, other facts support a finding of reasonable suspicion. Courts have recognized that rental cars…