From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johnson v. Bickell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 2:12 - 100 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2012)

Summary

finding that the "petitioner's bald assertion of prejudice does not provide sufficient information to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination in the exercise of peremptory strikes"

Summary of this case from Victor v. Varano

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:12 - 100

12-19-2012

CHESTER JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. TABB BICKELL, ET AL, Respondents.


District Judge Terrence F. McVerry


MEMORANDUM ORDER

On January 30, 2012, the above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1) and was referred to a united states magistrate judge for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and the Local Rules of Court for Magistrate Judges.

The magistrate judge filed a Report and Recommendation on November 26, 2012 (ECF No. 26) recommending that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus be denied and that a certificate of appealability be denied. On December 14, 2012, Petitioner filed Objections to the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 27). Petitioner's objections do not undermine the recommendation of the magistrate judge.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, and the Objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 19th day of December, 2012:

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 26) is ADOPTED as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED.

AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.

By the Court:

_________________________

Terrence F. McVerry

United States District Judge
Chester Johnson
GZ-2681
SCI Huntingdon
1100 Pike Street
Huntingdon, PA 16654-1112


Summaries of

Johnson v. Bickell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Dec 19, 2012
Civil Action No. 2:12 - 100 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2012)

finding that the "petitioner's bald assertion of prejudice does not provide sufficient information to establish a prima facie case of racial discrimination in the exercise of peremptory strikes"

Summary of this case from Victor v. Varano
Case details for

Johnson v. Bickell

Case Details

Full title:CHESTER JOHNSON, Petitioner, v. TABB BICKELL, ET AL, Respondents.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Dec 19, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:12 - 100 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 19, 2012)

Citing Cases

Victor v. Varano

Regardless of whether Petitioner's claim is procedurally defaulted, see (Doc. 1, pp. 35-37) (letter from…