From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Johns v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 7, 2008
971 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Summary

concluding that a PRR designation is improper for a felony battery conviction under section 784.03, Florida Statutes, because that statute merely reclassifies simple battery as a felony battery based on a prior battery conviction

Summary of this case from Washington v. State

Opinion

No. 1D06-6449.

January 7, 2008.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Leon County, Richard L. Hood, J.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Bill McCollum, Attorney General, and Joshua R. Heller, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Darnell Johns appeals his conviction of felony battery and corresponding sentence of five years of incarceration as a prison releasee reoffender. We affirm the conviction without further discussion; however, we reverse the sentence, and remand for removal of the prison releasee reoffender designation.

The State concedes that the prison releasee reoffender designation was improper because the conviction was under section 784.03(2), Florida Statutes (2006), which reclassifies a simple battery as a felony battery because of a prior battery conviction. The Florida Supreme Court has recently held that a conviction for battery on a law enforcement officer will not support sentencing enhancement as a violent career criminal because it can never be a forcible felony. See State v. Hearns, 961 So.2d 211, 219 (Fla. 2007). In doing so, it noted that battery on a law enforcement officer is just simple battery reclassified merely because of the victim's status, and that the question of whether battery on a law enforcement officer qualifies for either a violent career criminal or a prison releasee reoffender designation must be answered consistently. Id. at 217, 219. Analogously, the instant conviction was of simple battery reclassified merely because of the offender's prior battery conviction; thus, it also can never be a forcible felony, and so will not support a prison releasee reoffender (or a violent career criminal) sentence. See Spradlin v. State, 967 So.2d 376 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part, and REMANDED for resentencing.

KAHN and ROBERTS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Johns v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jan 7, 2008
971 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

concluding that a PRR designation is improper for a felony battery conviction under section 784.03, Florida Statutes, because that statute merely reclassifies simple battery as a felony battery based on a prior battery conviction

Summary of this case from Washington v. State

discussing that Johns's felony battery conviction could not be enhanced via the PRR statute because the reclassified simple battery can "never be a forcible felony, and so will not support a[PRR] sentence"

Summary of this case from Davis v. State
Case details for

Johns v. State

Case Details

Full title:Darnell JOHNS, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jan 7, 2008

Citations

971 So. 2d 271 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Washington v. State

The legality of a sentence presents a question of law and is reviewed de novo. Clowers v. State, 31 So.3d…

Dominguez v. State

Noting that simple battery constitutes any intentional touching, however slight, the Fourth District held…