From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jenrette v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 25, 1980
390 So. 2d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Summary

holding that aggravated battery with a firearm and possession and use of a firearm in the commission of the felony of aggravated battery are identical

Summary of this case from Davis v. State

Opinion

No. 80-438.

November 25, 1980.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, John A. Tanksley, J.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Elliot H. Scherker, Asst. Public Defender, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Paul Mendelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HENDRY, SCHWARTZ and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.


Pursuant to our decision affirming his convictions on the merits in Jenrette v. State, 373 So.2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), the defendant filed a motion under Fla.R. Crim.P. 3.850 alternatively seeking to vacate either the judgment and sentence for aggravated battery committed with a firearm, or the judgment and concurrent sentence on the separate charge of possession of a firearm in the commission of the aggravated battery. The trial judge set aside only the sentence on the possession charge and otherwise denied the motion. Jenrette has appealed, primarily arguing that the aggravated battery, instead of the possession, charge should have been vacated. We reject this contention.

Under the doctrine of State v. Pinder, 375 So.2d 836 (Fla. 1979), a defendant may not be convicted of two or more offenses which involve the same criminal acts. In such an instance, only a conviction for the greater charge may stand. Both aggravated battery, Sec. 784.045, Fla. Stat. (1979) and possession of a firearm in the commission of a felony, Sec. 790.07(2), Fla. Stat. (1979) are second degree felonies. However, under Sec. 775.087(2), Fla. Stat. (1979), only the aggravated battery, and not the possession charge requires a three-year minimum mandatory sentence. Because of the manifestly more severe sentencing consequences of aggravated battery, we conclude that it is the "greater" of the two crimes, and that the trial judge therefore properly declined to vacate that conviction.

In accordance with the statutory mandate, Jenrette was given eight years, subject to the three year mandatory requirement, for aggravated battery; and a five-year concurrent sentence, with no condition, on the possession count.

Insofar as their elements are concerned, the crimes of which Jenrette was found guilty, aggravated battery committed by shooting the victim with a firearm and the possession and use of a firearm in the commission of the felony of aggravated battery, are identical. Neither is, in the usual sense, a "lesser included offense" of the other.

The appellant's fall-back position is that the adjudication, as well as the sentence, on the possession count should be set aside. On the authority of State v. Pinder, supra, and Hegstrom v. State, 388 So.2d 1308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980), we agree and order that this be done after remand.

Affirmed in part, reversed in part.


Summaries of

Jenrette v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 25, 1980
390 So. 2d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

holding that aggravated battery with a firearm and possession and use of a firearm in the commission of the felony of aggravated battery are identical

Summary of this case from Davis v. State
Case details for

Jenrette v. State

Case Details

Full title:BUFORD LEE JENRETTE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 25, 1980

Citations

390 So. 2d 781 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1980)

Citing Cases

Gonzalez v. State

It appears that we may have overlooked Noble in Jenrette v. State, 373 So.2d 718 (Fla. 3d DCA 1979), where,…

Davis v. State

Count III, charging grand larceny, was dismissed. We reverse the order of the trial court denying Davis'…