Summary
discussing reluctance to second-guess counsel's trial strategy simply because that strategy was unsuccessful
Summary of this case from Muller v. LeeOpinion
9:03-CV-1172 (LEK/DRH).
March 22, 2007
DECISION AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court following a Report-Recommendation filed on February 15, 2007 by the Honorable David R. Homer, United States Magistrate Judge, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and L.R. 72.4 of the Northern District of New York. Report-Rec. (Dkt. No. 50). After ten days from the service thereof, the Clerk has sent the entire file to the undersigned, including the objections by Petitioner David Jenkins ("Petitioner"), which were filed on March 1, 2007. Objections (Dkt. No. 51).
It is the duty of this Court to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made." 28 U.S.C. § 636(b). "A [district] judge . . . may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate judge." Id. This Court has considered the objections and has undertaken a de novo review of the record and has determined that the Report-Recommendation should be approved for the reasons stated therein.
Accordingly, it is hereby
ORDERED, that the Report-Recommendation (Dkt. No. 50) is APPROVED and ADOPTED in its ENTIRETY; and it is further
ORDERED, that Petitioner's Petition for a writ of habeas corpus (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED; and it is further
ORDERED, that the Clerk serve a copy of this Order on all parties.