holding that, because the violation of probation (VOP) hearing was neither a criminal prosecution nor a formal trial, the Sixth Amendment does not apply
Summary of this case from Franco v. StateNo. 133, 2004.
November 23, 2004.
Appeal from the Superior Court, New Castle County, CrA IN03-05-0533 and PN03-05-1787.
Decision without published opinion. Affirmed.
holding that, because the violation of probation (VOP) hearing was neither a criminal prosecution nor a formal trial, the Sixth Amendment does not apply
Summary of this case from Franco v. Statedeclining to apply Crawford because a violation of probation hearing is neither a formal trial nor a criminal prosecution
Summary of this case from Peters v. Statedeclining to apply Crawford because a violation of probation hearing is neither a formal trial nor a criminal prosecution
Summary of this case from Peters v. StateFull title:ANTOINE JENKINS, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. STATE OF DELAWARE…
Court:Supreme Court of Delaware
Date published: Nov 23, 2004
Id. Other courts have recognized the inapplicability of Crawford to probation revocation or its equivalent.…
Peters v. Statemendment does not apply to supervised release revocation hearings);United States v. Rondeau, 430 F.3d 44 (1st…