From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.E.J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 24, 1987
505 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Opinion

No. 85-2787.

March 24, 1987.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Pinellas County, Jack A. Page, J.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, Bartow, and Brad Permar Asst. Public Defender, Clearwater, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Gary O. Welch, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.


We affirm the appellant's conviction and reject his contention that section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1985), is unconstitutionally vague when applied to children under sixteen years of age. Accordingly, as in L.L.N. v. State, 504 So.2d 6, on rehearing (Fla. 2d DCA 1987), we declare section 800.04, Florida Statutes (1985), to be valid.

SCHEB, A.C.J., and RYDER and HALL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

J.E.J. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Mar 24, 1987
505 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)
Case details for

J.E.J. v. State

Case Details

Full title:J.E.J., JR., A CHILD, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Mar 24, 1987

Citations

505 So. 2d 516 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1987)

Citing Cases

State v. J.A.S

It simply means that the legislature intended no such distinction. The second district reaffirmed this…

Allstate Ins. Co. v. Bailey

If properly established, Manuel Zayas's alleged conduct could be criminally actionable in Florida. Fla.Stat.…