From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jedlicka v. Proctor

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 15, 1999
724 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion

No. 96-04944

January 15, 1999.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Lee County, Lynn Gerald, Jr., Judge.

Martin G. Arnowitz of Goldstein, Buckley, Cechman, Rice Purtz, P.A., Fort Myers; and Michael C. Tice, Fort Myers, for Appellant.

Mark A. Boyle and Michael G. Fink of Fink Boyle, P.A., Fort Myers, for Appellees.


Richard Jedlicka appeals the final judgment in his action for damages arising out of an automobile accident. Jedlicka presents four issues on appeal. We find merit only on Jedlicka's claim that the trial court erred in reducing his damage award because of his failure to obtain the statutorily required personal injury protection. We recognize conflict exists between the Second and Fourth Districts on this question; however, we conclude that the precedent of this court supports Jedlicka in his contention. Thus, we reverse on this issue.

The reversible issue is controlled by Reynolds v. Life Insurance Co. of Virginia, 399 So.2d 519 (Fla. 2d DCA 1981), and Ward v. Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co., 364 So.2d 73 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), which hold that it is error to reduce a plaintiff's damage award because of his or her failure to obtain the statutorily required personal injury protection. Therefore, we reverse on this point and remand for entry of a corrected final judgment. In so doing, we certify conflict with Holt v. King, 707 So.2d 1141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

Affirmed in part; reversed and remanded in part; conflict certified.

CAMPBELL, A.C.J., and FULMER, J., Concur.


Summaries of

Jedlicka v. Proctor

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Jan 15, 1999
724 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Jedlicka v. Proctor

Case Details

Full title:Richard JEDLICKA, Appellant, v. Ruth PROCTOR and Norman Proctor, Appellees

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Jan 15, 1999

Citations

724 So. 2d 668 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Cases v. Gray

On the authority of, and for the reasons well expressed in Holt, we hold that a PIP setoff is required and…