From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.E.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 20, 2002
842 So. 2d 851 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Summary

In J.E.A., under facts identical to those before this court concerning the interplay of the felony battery statute and the provisions in the juvenile statute, the Second District held section 985.228's silence on the treatment to be afforded a withhold of adjudication prevented the same from being treated as a "conviction."

Summary of this case from W.J.H. v. State

Opinion

Case No. 2D01-3186.

Opinion filed December 20, 2002.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; Marion L. Fleming, Judge.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and Richard P. Albertine, Jr., Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Richard E. Doran, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard M. Klawikofsky, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.


J.E.A. challenges a final disposition order entered for a felony battery charge. Because Florida's juvenile delinquency statute does not expressly authorize the use of prior withheld delinquency adjudications to enhance the level of criminal offenses, we reverse and remand for a final disposition hearing on misdemeanor battery.

Section 784.03(2), Florida Statutes (2000), provides that "[a] person who has two prior convictions for battery who commits a third or subsequent battery commits a felony of the third degree." (Emphasis supplied). Based on his history of four prior batteries, J.E.A. was charged with third-degree felony battery in violation of section 784.03(2). On appeal he argues that the lower court erred in enhancing the offense to a felony based on prior battery cases in which delinquency adjudications were withheld. We agree.

Section 784.03(2), Florida Statutes (2000), was amended effective July 1, 2001, to require only one prior battery conviction in order to enhance the offense to felony battery. Ch. 01-50, § 4, at 320, Laws of Fla. The battery in this case was committed on March 17, 2001, four months prior to the effective date of the amendment.

Section 985.228(6), Florida Statutes (2000), provides that except as used in chapter 322 (drivers' licenses) and except for use in a subsequent juvenile proceeding, an adjudication of delinquency shall not be deemed a "conviction." While this section expressly provides that a delinquency adjudication may be used as a "conviction" in subsequent juvenile proceedings, it is silent concerning the use of a disposition resulting in a withheld adjudication for this purpose. State v. T.T., 773 So.2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (affirming the dismissal of a delinquency petition which charged a child with felony petit theft based on two prior withheld adjudications and finding no statutory authority for enhancing the offense). J.E.A. was adjudicated delinquent in only one of the four prior battery cases. In the absence of express language indicating that a withheld adjudication may be used as a conviction, this battery should not have been enhanced to a third-degree felony.

Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

BLUE, C.J., and FULMER, J., Concur.


Summaries of

J.E.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District
Dec 20, 2002
842 So. 2d 851 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

In J.E.A., under facts identical to those before this court concerning the interplay of the felony battery statute and the provisions in the juvenile statute, the Second District held section 985.228's silence on the treatment to be afforded a withhold of adjudication prevented the same from being treated as a "conviction."

Summary of this case from W.J.H. v. State
Case details for

J.E.A. v. State

Case Details

Full title:J.E.A., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District

Date published: Dec 20, 2002

Citations

842 So. 2d 851 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2002)

Citing Cases

W.J.H. v. State

Despite the battery statute's definition of "conviction," W.J.H. insisted, because adjudication was withheld…

T.E.B. v. State

We held that "a withheld adjudication for simple battery in juvenile court may not be used as a predicate…