From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.B. Muros Corporation v. Int'l Mall

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 29, 1988
534 So. 2d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 88-901.

November 29, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Dade County, David L. Tobin, J.

Jose M. Rodriguez-Gomez, Hialeah, for appellant.

Ferdie Gouz, and Michael Heidt, Coral Gables, for appellee.

Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and NESBITT and BASKIN, JJ.


Appellant seeks review of an order dismissing its complaint with prejudice, striking its answer to appellee's counterclaim, and entering a judgment in favor of the appellee. Subsequent to this litigation being set for a non-jury trial, counsel for appellant J.B. Muros Corporation failed to appear at this case's call of the calendar. Under such circumstances, it may be appropriate for a trial judge to impose sanctions against an attorney, but we must conclude that the ultimate sanction of dismissing a party's complaint is too severe unless it is apparent from the record that indeed the client was in defiance of the court's authority. Travelers Ins. Co. v. Rodriguez, 357 So.2d 464 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978); Masons Concrete of Crystal River, Inc. v. Corbin Well Pump Supply, Inc., 364 So.2d 824 (Fla. 2d DCA 1978), cert. denied, 373 So.2d 457 (Fla. 1979); First Republic Corp. v. Hayes, 431 So.2d 624 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 441 So.2d 632 (Fla. 1983).

The order of dismissal is reversed with directions to reinstate the complaint and answer to the defendant's counterclaim.


Summaries of

J.B. Muros Corporation v. Int'l Mall

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Nov 29, 1988
534 So. 2d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

J.B. Muros Corporation v. Int'l Mall

Case Details

Full title:J.B. MUROS CORPORATION, A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLANT, v. INTERNATIONAL…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Nov 29, 1988

Citations

534 So. 2d 818 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Arango v. Alvarez

The mere assertion by a party to a lawsuit that he does not comprehend . . . legal obligations . . . does not…

DHSMV v. Brandenburg

This commentary is not directed at the Department's legal staff, who acted immediately upon being served with…