From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jaszay v. Corporation

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 14, 1992
598 So. 2d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Summary

holding nursing home estopped from raising statute of limitations defense when it stipulated to sixty-day extension of presuit screening period

Summary of this case from Ryan v. Gonzalez

Opinion

No. 91-0742.

April 8, 1992. Rehearing and/or Clarification Denied May 14, 1992.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Broward County, George A. Brescher, J.

Jean Anne Kneale and Robert S. Glazier of Hicks, Anderson Blum, P.A., Miami, for appellant.

Linda R. Spaulding of Conrad, Scherer James, Fort Lauderdale, for appellee.


The plaintiff appeals from a final summary judgment which dismissed her complaint holding that the statute of limitations barred the action. We reverse. The appellee is estopped from asserting the limitations defense because it stipulated to a sixty-day extension of the pre-suit screening period required under section 766.106, Florida Statutes (1991). To repeat Judge Schwartz's famous quote, we will not countenance such "gotcha" maneuvers. Salcedo v. Asociacion Cubana, Inc., 368 So.2d 1337 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 378 So.2d 342 (Fla. 1979). We also reject the appellee's companion argument that its insurer had no authority to enter into the stipulation.

REVERSED.

LETTS, DELL and FARMER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jaszay v. Corporation

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
May 14, 1992
598 So. 2d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

holding nursing home estopped from raising statute of limitations defense when it stipulated to sixty-day extension of presuit screening period

Summary of this case from Ryan v. Gonzalez

estopping a defendant from asserting a statute of limitations defense because it had stipulated to a sixty-day extension of the presuit screening period

Summary of this case from Ryan v. Gonzalez

stating that a nursing home that stipulated to a 60-day extension of the pre-suit screening period was estopped from later asserting a limitations defense in a malpractice action

Summary of this case from Coventry First v. State

stating defendant was estopped from asserting the statute of limitations defense because it had stipulated to a sixty-day extension

Summary of this case from Fox v. City of Pompano Beach
Case details for

Jaszay v. Corporation

Case Details

Full title:BARBARA JASZAY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF BORBALA BATU…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: May 14, 1992

Citations

598 So. 2d 112 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1992)

Citing Cases

Ryan v. Gonzalez

Every case that has applied the doctrine to avoid a statute of limitations defense involved plaintiffs who…

Ryan v. Gonzalez

Similarly, the district court of appeal cases cited in footnote eleven of S.A.P. involve situations where the…