Summary
In Jamison v. State, 583 So.2d 413 (Fla. 4th DCA), rev. denied, 591 So.2d 182 (Fla. 1991), and McCall v. State, 583 So.2d 411 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991), the court relied upon this Court's decision in Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1990), in concluding that chapter 89-280 did not violate the single subject rule.
Summary of this case from State v. JohnsonOpinion
No. 90-2514.
July 31, 1991.
Appeal from the Circuit Court, Palm Beach County, Walter N. Colbath, Jr., J.
Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Paul E. Petillo, Asst. Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Dawn S. Wynn, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.
We affirm the appellant's conviction and sentence as a habitual offender. We reject appellant's contention that chapter 89-280, Laws of Florida, amending section 775.084, Florida Statutes, violates the single subject rule of article III, section 6 of the Florida Constitution. E.g., Burch v. State, 558 So.2d 1 (Fla. 1990).
HERSEY, STONE and GARRETT, JJ., concur.