From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Easterling v. Erwin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 4, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-00468-JCS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. 16-cv-00468-JCS (PR)

08-04-2016

JAMAL EASTERLING, Plaintiff, v. ERWIN, Defendant.


ORDER RE: DIRECTIONS TO PLAINTIFF;

VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

This order provides instructions to plaintiff regarding service of his complaint.

The sole defendant in this action, Dr. Erwin, remains unserved, his summons having been returned as unexecuted. (Docket No. 9.) Salinas Valley State Prison authorities state that no one named Erwin works for the prison or is employed there under contract. (Id.)

Plaintiff is directed to comply with the following. He must provide the Court with Erwin's current address so that the complaint can be served on him. In cases where the plaintiff proceeds in forma pauperis, "officers of the court shall issue and serve all process." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The Court must appoint the Marshal to effect service, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(c)(2), and the Marshal, upon order of the Court, must serve the summons and the complaint, see Walker v. Sumner, 14 F.3d 1415, 1422 (9th Cir. 1994). Although a plaintiff who is incarcerated and proceeding in forma pauperis may rely on service by the Marshal, the plaintiff "may not remain silent and do nothing to effectuate such service"; rather, "[a]t a minimum, a plaintiff should request service upon the appropriate defendant and attempt to remedy any apparent defects of which [he] has knowledge." Rochon v. Dawson, 828 F.2d 1107, 1110 (5th Cir. 1987).

Here, plaintiff's complaint has been pending for over 120 days, and, consequently, absent a showing of "good cause," is subject to dismissal without prejudice as to the unserved defendant, Erwin. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). Because plaintiff has not provided sufficient information to allow the Marshal to locate and serve this defendant, plaintiff must remedy the situation or face dismissal of his claims against Erwin. See Walker, 14 F.3d at 1421-22 (holding prisoner failed to show cause why prison official should not be dismissed under Rule 4(m) where prisoner failed to show he had provided Marshal with sufficient information to effectuate service).

Accordingly, plaintiff must either himself serve the unserved defendant with the summons and complaint, or provide the Court with the information described above so that the Marshal is able to serve such defendants. If plaintiff fails to effectuate service , or to provide the Court with an accurate current location or other information for the defendant on or before September 5, 2016, plaintiff's claims against the unserved defendant will be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

The current briefing schedule, which directed that defendant file a dispositive motion by July 18, 2016, is VACATED. When the defendant has been served, the Court will set a new briefing schedule.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: August 4, 2016

/s/_________

JOSEPH C. SPERO

Chief Magistrate Judge

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California.

That on August 4, 2016, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. Jamal Easterling ID: F-41722 C1-2266
Salinas Valley State Prison
P.O. Box 1050
Soledad, CA 93960 Dated: August 4, 2016

Susan Y. Soong

Clerk, United States District Court

By:/s/_________

Karen Hom, Deputy Clerk to the

Honorable JOSEPH C. SPERO


Summaries of

Easterling v. Erwin

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 4, 2016
Case No. 16-cv-00468-JCS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2016)
Case details for

Easterling v. Erwin

Case Details

Full title:JAMAL EASTERLING, Plaintiff, v. ERWIN, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 4, 2016

Citations

Case No. 16-cv-00468-JCS (PR) (N.D. Cal. Aug. 4, 2016)