From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jacobs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 17, 1990
567 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Summary

In Jacobs v. State, 567 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) we concluded that it was error to use a similar procedure at sentencing.

Summary of this case from Seymour v. State

Opinion

No. 89-1184.

September 5, 1990. Rehearing and Clarification Denied October 17, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, Charles E. Smith, J.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, Cherry Grant and Eric M. Cumfer, Asst. Public Defenders, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, Patricia G. Lampert, Asst. Atty. Gen., West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We affirm appellant's conviction; however, we find reversible error in the sentencing procedure which will require resentencing. Appellant was in jail at the time of sentencing. His attorney and the sentencing judge were in the courtroom. Communication was accomplished through closed-circuit television. Such an arrangement is not authorized by rule or statute and is consequently fatally and fundamentally flawed. Rule 3.180(a)(9), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, provides that a defendant shall be present at the pronouncement of judgment and the imposition of sentence. This is essential to permit the defendant to confer with his counsel privately and to have the benefit of his advice. Further, the rules specifically permit communication by way of audiovisual video camera at first appearances and at the arraignment stage of proceedings. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.130(a) and 3.160(a). Failure to include sentencing as an exception to the "personally present" requirement cannot be deemed mere oversight. Accordingly, we reverse the sentence and remand for resentencing.

We also strike the imposition of costs imposed upon the indigent appellant without prior notice. Mays v. State, 519 So.2d 618 (Fla. 1988); Jenkins v. State, 444 So.2d 947 (Fla. 1984). The requirement that appellant pay the Public Defender's fee is similarly flawed. Thomas v. State, 486 So.2d 69 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986).

AFFIRMED IN PART; REVERSED IN PART; REMANDED.

HERSEY, C.J., STONE, J. and OWEN, WILLIAM C., Jr., Associate Judge, concur.


Summaries of

Jacobs v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Oct 17, 1990
567 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

In Jacobs v. State, 567 So.2d 16 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) we concluded that it was error to use a similar procedure at sentencing.

Summary of this case from Seymour v. State
Case details for

Jacobs v. State

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN JACOBS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Oct 17, 1990

Citations

567 So. 2d 16 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

R.R. v. Portesy

He relies by way of analogy on similar language in Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.180 ("the defendant…

Williams v. State

With respect to the original sentencing hearing, we find no error in sentencing appellant where appellant was…