From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 1, 1998
712 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-1322

Opinion filed July 1, 1998 JANUARY TERM 1998

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; George A. Brescher, Judge; L.T. Case No. 95-4568 CF10A.

Richard L. Rosenbaum of the Law Offices of Richard L. Rosenbaum, Fort Lauderdale, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Aubin Wade Robinson, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


Appellant, Lawrence Jackson, was tried by jury and convicted of two counts of robbery with a firearm. We affirm in all respects, but remand with instructions that the trial court clarify the sentencing order to reflect that the mandatory minimum sentences imposed pursuant to the violent habitual felony offender statute, section 775.084(4)(b)1, Florida Statutes, and the three-year mandatory minimum for use of the firearm during the robberies, section 775.087(2), are to run concurrently not only as to each offense, but as to each other. See Jackson v. State, 659 So.2d 1060 (Fla. 1995). The appellant need not be present for the correction of the sentencing order.

AFFIRMED and REMANDED for clarification of the sentencing order.

STONE, C.J., STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Jackson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Jul 1, 1998
712 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Jackson v. State

Case Details

Full title:LAWRENCE JACKSON, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Jul 1, 1998

Citations

712 So. 2d 467 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Tunsil v. State

For that reason it is clear that the mandatory minimum sentences should be concurrent. See Jackson v. State,…