From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Jackson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Mar 16, 2007
Civ. No. 06-1347 (MJD/RLE) (D. Minn. Mar. 16, 2007)

Summary

noting that the ABA “does [not] provide for a private cause of action”

Summary of this case from Logan v. Matveevskii

Opinion

Civ. No. 06-1347 (MJD/RLE).

March 16, 2007


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Based upon the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge Raymond L. Erickson, and after an independent review of the files, records and proceedings in the above-titled matter, IT IS ORDERED:

1. That the Defendants BOP, Anderson, Herold, and the Doe Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 23] is granted.

2. That the Defendant Mayo Clinic's Motion to Dismiss [Docket No. 12] is granted.

3. That the Plaintiff's informal Motion for Appointment of Counsel [Docket No. 32] is denied.


Summaries of

Jackson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

United States District Court, D. Minnesota
Mar 16, 2007
Civ. No. 06-1347 (MJD/RLE) (D. Minn. Mar. 16, 2007)

noting that the ABA “does [not] provide for a private cause of action”

Summary of this case from Logan v. Matveevskii
Case details for

Jackson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Case Details

Full title:Henry L. Jackson, Plaintiff, v. The Federal Bureau of Prisons, Warden…

Court:United States District Court, D. Minnesota

Date published: Mar 16, 2007

Citations

Civ. No. 06-1347 (MJD/RLE) (D. Minn. Mar. 16, 2007)

Citing Cases

Smith v. McDonough

As such, Smith's claims against Nolan and Brooks are not viable and must be dismissed. See e.g., Jackson v.…

Scher v. Bureau of Prisons

Although this Court acknowledges that procuring an expert affidavit may be a difficult endeavor for a federal…