From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

J.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 4, 1996
684 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Opinion

Case No. 96-2631

Opinion filed December 4, 1996

Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit, Broward County; Robert Fogan, Judge; L.T. Case No. 96-3086.

Richard L. Jorandby, Public Defender, and Allen J. DeWeese, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Denise S. Calegan, Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.


We reverse the adjudication of delinquency in this case and remand for appellant's discharge. The state has conceded error. Appellant, a ten year old boy, was found guilty of criminal mischief by starting a fire which damaged the property of another in violation of section 806.13, Florida Statutes (1995). "The offense of criminal mischief requires that the actor possess the specific intent to damage the property of another." In the Interest of J.G., 655 So.2d 1284, 1285 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995). The trial court found that appellant did not mean to start the fire. Thus, the trial court erroneously found appellant guilty of criminal mischief where appellant lacked the requisite intent.

Reversed and remanded.

WARNER, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

J.A. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Dec 4, 1996
684 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)
Case details for

J.A. v. State

Case Details

Full title:J.A., a child, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Dec 4, 1996

Citations

684 So. 2d 264 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1996)

Citing Cases

R.E. v. State

" § 806.13(1)(a), Fla. Stat. (2008). A defendant must possess the specific intent to damage the property of…

Sanders v. State

The offense requires that the actor have a specific intent to damage property. J.A. v. State, 684 So.2d 264,…