From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Isom v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 12, 2001
790 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 2001)

Opinion

No. SC00-724

Opinion filed July 12, 2001.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Direct Conflict Third District — Case No. 3D97-2430 (Dade County)

Mary E. Adkins, Melrose, Florida, for Petitioner Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Michael J. Neimand, Senior Assistant Attorney General, and Douglas J. Glaid, Assistant Attorney General, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for Respondent


We initially accepted review in Isom v. State, 750 So.2d 734 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000), based on an alleged express and direct conflict with the First District's decision in Daniels v. State, 593 So.2d 312 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). Upon closer examination, however, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted in this case. Therefore, we dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING, ANSTEAD, PARIENTE, LEWIS, and QUINCE, JJ., concur.

NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.


Summaries of

Isom v. State

Supreme Court of Florida
Jul 12, 2001
790 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 2001)
Case details for

Isom v. State

Case Details

Full title:DOUGLAS ISOM, Petitioner, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jul 12, 2001

Citations

790 So. 2d 1092 (Fla. 2001)