From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Irvine v. T. Southwood 1295, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 21, 2007
948 So. 2d 981 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Opinion

No. 1D06-5299.

February 21, 2007.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Leon County, Thomas H. Bateman, III, J.

W. Bradley Munroe of W. Bradley Munroe, P.A., Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Kelly Overstreet Johnson of Broad and Cassel, Tallahassee, and Stephen A. Pitre of Clark, Partington, Hart, Larry, Bond Stackhouse, Pensacola, for Appellee.


Having considered the appellant's response to this Court's order to show cause, the Court has determined that the instant appeal is premature. The order on appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable partial final order as argued by the appellant. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are hereby denied as moot.

The appellant filed this appeal seeking review of an order labeled a "Final Judgment," which entered judgment on a counterclaim to quiet title and determined that the counterclaim of slander of title was thereby rendered moot. However, the partition action that had initiated this case has not been resolved. Therefore, this order is not a final order. See Caufield v. Cantele, 837 So.2d 371, 375 (Fla. 2002) (reaffirming the traditional test for finality requiring that "no further action by the court will be necessary"). Further, the order is not appealable as a partial final judgment pursuant to Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.110(k) because the remaining claim is related to the claims disposed of by the instant order. See Massachusetts Life Ins. Co. v. Crapo, 918 So.2d 393 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006). The overlap between the pending partition action and the quiet title and slander of title actions includes the factual determinations as to the validity of certain deeds and the respective interests of the parties in the real property at issue. Although the appellant argued that these issues are not unresolved, and therefore should not prevent the Court from finding jurisdiction, the test is whether the claims arise out of a common set of facts and not whether the factual issues themselves have been resolved in the nonfinal order on appeal.

DISMISSED.

ALLEN, PADOVANO, and LEWIS, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Irvine v. T. Southwood 1295, Inc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Feb 21, 2007
948 So. 2d 981 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)
Case details for

Irvine v. T. Southwood 1295, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Everett W. IRVINE, IV, Appellant, v. T. SOUTHWOOD 1295, INC., a Florida…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Feb 21, 2007

Citations

948 So. 2d 981 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2007)

Citing Cases

Skopelos v. Silivos

The court has indicated that its judicial labor will continue to be engaged in this lawsuit, and the…

McGrath v. Puckett

The order denied the petition upon determining the best interest of the minor child pursuant to an analysis…