From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Technologies Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Dec 10, 2010
404 F. App'x 496 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2010-1003.

December 10, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California in no. 04-CV-0511, Judge Gary A. Feess.

Ted S. Ward, Berke, Kent Ward LLP, of Los Angeles, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant.

John B. Sganga, Jr., Knobbe, Martens, Olson Bear, LLP, of Irvine, California, argued for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief were Paul A. Stewart, Joseph S. Cianfrani, David G. Jankowski and Christopher L. Ross.

Before RADER, Chief Judge, PLAGER and GAJARSA, Circuit Judges.


JUDGMENT


THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:

AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.


Summaries of

Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Technologies Corp.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Dec 10, 2010
404 F. App'x 496 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
Case details for

Intamin, Ltd. v. Magnetar Technologies Corp.

Case Details

Full title:INTAMIN, LTD., Plaintiff-Appellant v. MAGNETAR TECHNOLOGIES CORP.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Dec 10, 2010

Citations

404 F. App'x 496 (Fed. Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

Nat'l Steel Car Ltd. v. Greenbrier-Concarril, LLC

“[D]ependent claims incorporate by reference all the claim limitations of a referenced claim, and include…

Magnetar Techs. Corp. v. Intamin, Ltd.

The Federal Circuit affirmed the district court's second grant of summary judgment, per curiam. See Intamin,…