From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Inman v. Travelers' Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division A
May 27, 1929
122 So. 537 (Miss. 1929)

Opinion

No. 27746.

May 27, 1929.

APPEAL AND ERROR. Motion to retax costs, not filed within time allowed for filing suggestions of error, must be dismissed (supreme court rule 14).

Motion to have former judgment on appeal set aside in so far as it adjudged court costs and to have different judgment rendered relative thereto is suggestion of error, and, not having been filed within time allowed under supreme court rule 14 for filing suggestions of error, it must be dismissed.

APPEAL from chancery court of Wilkinson county, HON. R.W. CUTRER, Chancellor.

Jones Stockett, of Woodville, for appellant.

Brandon Brandon, of Natchez, for appellee.


In this cause the complainant, Bennie Inman, and the defendant, Travelers' Insurance Company, each prosecuted an appeal to this court from certain orders entered in the court below on motions therein filed; appeal bonds being executed by both Inman and the insurance company. On March 11, 1929, this court ordered that the appeals be dismissed, and a judgment was accordingly entered, in which Inman was taxed with the entire costs of the appeal, and on May 7, 1929, the said Inman filed a motion herein styled "A Motion to Retax Costs," the prayer of which is that the court correct the judgment entered by retaxing the costs so as to divide them equally between the parties to the appeal, or to tax each party with the costs incurred at his, or its, instance.

This motion, clearly comes within the rule announced in the case of Bacot v. Holloway, 140 Miss. 134, 104 So. 696, 105 So. 739, in which it was held that a motion seeking to have a former judgment set aside, in so far as it adjudged the court costs, and to have a different judgment rendered relative thereto, is a suggestion of error, and must be filed within the time prescribed by rule 14 of this court. This purported motion was not filed within the time allowed for filing suggestions of error, and therefore it must be dismissed.

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Inman v. Travelers' Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division A
May 27, 1929
122 So. 537 (Miss. 1929)
Case details for

Inman v. Travelers' Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:INMAN v. TRAVELERS' INS. CO

Court:Supreme Court of Mississippi, Division A

Date published: May 27, 1929

Citations

122 So. 537 (Miss. 1929)
122 So. 537

Citing Cases

The Home Insurance Co. v. Watts

APPELLANT'S RESPONSE TO THE SUGGESTION OF ERROR OF UNIVERSAL C.I.T. CREDIT CORPORATION. I. The suggestion of…

State Highway Comm. v. Mason

Smith, C.J., delivered a dissenting opinion on motion to correct judgment. I am of the opinion that this…