From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Injection Research Special v. Polaris Indus

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Aug 13, 1998
168 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 1998)

Summary

refusing to enforce waiver where language of the waiver was ambiguous and the agreement contained terms seemingly inconsistent with the purported waiver

Summary of this case from Victor G. Reiling Associates v. Fisher-Price, Inc.

Opinion

Nos. 97-1516, 97-1545, 97-1557.

August 13, 1998.



D.Ct./D.Colo.

Affirmed in part, Reversed in part.


Summaries of

Injection Research Special v. Polaris Indus

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
Aug 13, 1998
168 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 1998)

refusing to enforce waiver where language of the waiver was ambiguous and the agreement contained terms seemingly inconsistent with the purported waiver

Summary of this case from Victor G. Reiling Associates v. Fisher-Price, Inc.
Case details for

Injection Research Special v. Polaris Indus

Case Details

Full title:Injection Research Specialists , Inc. v. Polaris Indus., L.P

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit

Date published: Aug 13, 1998

Citations

168 F.3d 1320 (Fed. Cir. 1998)

Citing Cases

Yurman Design, Inc. v. PAJ, Inc.

Setting aside the fact that without any predicate award of Lanham Act damages nothing has been awarded by the…

Victor G. Reiling Associates v. Fisher-Price, Inc.

No. 01 CIV 2683 (SAS), 2001 WL 1111966, at *8 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 20, 2001) (noting, "without evidence to the…