From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Thompson v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 10, 2001
283 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)

Opinion

May 10, 2001.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Sise, J.), entered September 21, 2000 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as time barred.

Robert D. Thompson, Coxsackie, appellant in person.

Eliot Spitzer, Attorney-General (Wayne L. Benjamin of counsel), Albany, for respondent.

Before: Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Mugglin and, Lahtinen, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

After receiving an administrative determination on February 21, 2000 which found him guilty of violating a prison disciplinary rule, petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding. Supreme Court granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition as barred by the Statute of Limitations because the executed order to show cause and petition were not filed in the Albany County Clerk's office until June 26, 2000.

Given the recent decision in Matter of Grant v. Senkowski ( 95 N.Y.2d 605), the Attorney-General notes that inasmuch as petitioner's affidavit in support of the order to show cause, verified petition and memorandum of law were received by the court clerk on June 12, 2000, which constitutes the date of the commencement of this proceeding (see,id.), respondent is withdrawing his timeliness objection on Statute of Limitations grounds. Because respondent has not answered the petition in this matter, the judgment is vacated and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court to permit respondent to serve an answer within 45 days of this Court's decision.

ORDERED that the judgment is reversed, on the law, without costs, and matter remitted to the Supreme Court to permit respondent to serve an answer within 45 days of this Court's decision.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Thompson v. Selsky

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
May 10, 2001
283 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
Case details for

In the Matter of Thompson v. Selsky

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ROBERT D. THOMPSON, APPELLANT, v. DONALD SELSKY, AS…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: May 10, 2001

Citations

283 A.D.2d 752 (N.Y. App. Div. 2001)
724 N.Y.S.2d 369

Citing Cases

Standifer v. Goord

Service of process on the Attorney-General alone is insufficient to confer personal jurisdiction over…

Rosario v. Bennett

But, absent any evidence that the Legislature intended to vary for their benefit the filing-by-receipt…