Opinion
2002-10838.
Decided May 17, 2004.
In three related proceedings pursuant to Social Services Law § 384-b to terminate parental rights on the ground of mental illness, the mother appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Lim, J.), dated October 8, 2002, which, after a fact-finding hearing, terminated her parental rights with respect to the three children and transferred custody and guardianship of the children to the Catholic Home Bureau for Dependent Children and the Administration for Children's Services for the purpose of adoption.
Helene Bernstein, Brooklyn, N.Y., for appellant.
Magovern Sclafani, New York, N.Y. (Keith D. Grace of counsel), for respondent.
Monica Drinane, New York, N.Y. (Susan Clement of counsel), Law Guardian for Winston Lloyd D. and Colton Richard D. Richard Colodny, Brooklyn, N.Y., Law Guardian for Danisha Amoy C.
Before: MYRIAM J. ALTMAN, J.P., GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, THOMAS A. ADAMS, STEPHEN G. CRANE, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the appeal from so much of the order as pertains to the child Winston Lloyd D. is dismissed as academic, without costs or disbursements, since he reached the age of majority ( see Matter of Francisco Anthony C.F., Jr., 305 A.D.2d 410); and it is further,
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as reviewed, without costs or disbursements.
The petitioner agency established by clear and convincing evidence that the mother, presently and for the foreseeable future, will be unable to provide proper and adequate care for her children by reason of mental illness ( see Social Services Law § 384-b[g], [4][c], [6][a]). The court-appointed psychiatrist interviewed the mother twice and reviewed the medical records pertaining to her out-patient treatment at Brooklyn Psychiatric Centers, her hospitalization at Bronx Lebanon Hospital, and from the petitioner's doctors. Based on the interviews and medical records, the psychiatrist testified that the mother suffers from paranoid schizophrenia. The psychiatrist opined that due to the chronic nature of the illness, the mother's symptoms, and her lack of insight about her illness, the children, if returned to the mother, would be at risk of being neglected in the present and foreseeable future. This evidence supported the Family Court's determination ( see Matter of Ernesto Thomas A., 5 A.D.3d 380; Matter of Jon C., 305 A.D.2d 592; Matter of Pariis L., 286 A.D.2d 501).
Because the petition was granted on the ground of mental illness, the Family Court was not required to hold a dispositional hearing ( see Matter of Joyce T., 65 N.Y.2d 39, 46; Matter of Pauline Y., 193 A.D.2d 686, 687).
The mother's remaining contention is without merit.
ALTMAN, J.P., GOLDSTEIN, ADAMS and CRANE, JJ., concur.