From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In the Matter of Chance

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 28, 1981
284 S.E.2d 231 (S.C. 1981)

Summary

noting South Carolina appellate courts have "consistently refrained" from issuing purely advisory opinions

Summary of this case from Grazia v. S.C. State Plastering

Opinion

October 28, 1981.

Appeal from Family Court, Richland County; Robert H. Burnside, Judge.

Deputy Appellate Defender Vance J. Bettis, Columbia, for appellant. Atty. Gen. Daniel R. McLeod and Asst. Atty. Gen. Donald J. Zelenka, Columbia, for respondent.


October 28, 1981.


Appellant, a juvenile charged with auto breaking and petit larceny, was adjudicated a delinquent and committed to six (6) months probation. This appeal is from the denial of the trial judge to expunge from appellant's intake sheet any reference to prior non-adjudicated charges.

Under the record of this case a purely advisory opinion is sought. This Court has consistently refrained from rendering such opinions. See Biter v. South Carolina Employment Commission, S.C. 280 S.E.2d 60 (1981). Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed.

Appeal dismissed.

LEWIS, C.J., and LITTLEJOHN, NESS and HARWELL, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

In the Matter of Chance

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Oct 28, 1981
284 S.E.2d 231 (S.C. 1981)

noting South Carolina appellate courts have "consistently refrained" from issuing purely advisory opinions

Summary of this case from Grazia v. S.C. State Plastering

noting South Carolina appellate courts have "consistently refrained" from issuing purely advisory opinions

Summary of this case from Com'rs of Pub. v. Dept. of Health

noting South Carolina appellate courts have "consistently refrained" from issuing purely advisory opinions

Summary of this case from McDill v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.
Case details for

In the Matter of Chance

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Andrew CHANCE, A Minor Under the Age of Seventeen Years…

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Oct 28, 1981

Citations

284 S.E.2d 231 (S.C. 1981)
284 S.E.2d 231

Citing Cases

McDill v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.

Thus, since the underlying tort action was decided adversely to the McDills, they are not entitled to UIM…

Grazia v. S.C. State Plastering

See Griffin v. Capital Cash, 310 S.C. 288, 294, 423 S.E.2d 143, 147 (Ct.App. 1992) (citing Friedberg…