From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re WNS, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.
Feb 12, 1993
150 B.R. 663 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 1993)

Summary

holding that “the Court is not bound to award the fees sought, and it has the duty to independently examine the reasonableness of the fees”

Summary of this case from In re King

Opinion


150 B.R. 663 (Bkrtcy.S.D.Tex. 1993) In re WNS, INC., Wallpapers To Go, Inc., Wicks 'N' Sticks, Inc., Debtors. Bankruptcy Nos. 92-40938-H1-11, 92-40939-H3-11 and 92-40940-H2-11. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. February 12, 1993

        ORDER

        MANUEL D. LEAL, Chief Judge.

         Came on for consideration the Final Application for Allowance of Compensation filed by Deloitte & Touche in which Deloitte & Touche seeks court approval of

Page 664.

$22,084.00 for accountants' fees. An accounting firm's fee application is reviewed under the same standards as those applied to attorneys. In re Chas. A. Stevens & Co., 109 B.R. 853, 855 (Bankr.N.D.Ill.1990). The Court has considered this fee application in light of the standards for awarding fees set forth in In re First Colonial Corp. of America, 544 F.2d 1291 (5th Cir.1977), cert. denied, 431 U.S. 904, 97 S.Ct. 1696, 52 L.Ed.2d 388 (1977).

         The burden of proving the reasonableness of compensation and reimbursement pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 330 is on the fee applicant. In re Wizard Enterprises, Inc., 109 B.R. 708, 709 (Bankr.W.D.La.1990). Moreover, bankruptcy courts and district courts have broad discretion in determining the amount of attorneys' fees to award as compensation for services performed in connection with bankruptcy proceedings. In re First Colonial, at 1298. Even if no objections are raised to a fee application, the Court is not bound to award the fees sought, and it has the duty to independently examine the reasonableness of the fees. In re NRG Resources, Inc., 64 B.R. 643, 650 (Bankr.W.D.La.1986).

         This Court has determined that fee applicant Deloitte & Touche has failed to meet its burden of proof to establish that all of the fees and expenses requested were reasonably and necessarily incurred. Specifically, the hourly rates billed by many of applicant's employees are excessive when compared with the benefit of the services provided to the estate. These rates are as follows:

        Professional Billing Total Total

        Level Rate Hours Fees

        Tax Partner $300/hour 1.0 $ 300.00

        Tax Senior Manager $225/hour 20.0 $ 4,500.00

        Tax Partner $300/hour .7 $ 210.00 *

        Tax Senior Manager $300/hour 5.7 $ 1,710.00 *

        Tax Senior Manager $300/hour .5 $ 150.00 *

        Tax Senior Manager $300/hour 3.0 $ 900.00 *

        Tax Partner $300/hour 4.0 $ 1,200.00 *

        Tax Senior Manager $225/hour 48.4 $10,890.00 *

        Tax Senior Manager $225/hour 2.8 $ 630.00

        FN*These fees were subsequently reduced 25% by applicant, and the Court has

        applied this reduction to its calculation of the fee award.

        Deloitte & Touche failed to convince this Court that the results obtained for the estate warrant an award of fees based on such high rates.

        Accordingly, this Court authorizes an award of $5,359.00 for accountants' fees to Deloitte & Touche. The balance of the fees requested is disallowed because the fees were billed at excessive hourly rates.


Summaries of

In re WNS, Inc.

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.
Feb 12, 1993
150 B.R. 663 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 1993)

holding that “the Court is not bound to award the fees sought, and it has the duty to independently examine the reasonableness of the fees”

Summary of this case from In re King
Case details for

In re WNS, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:In re WNS, INC., Wallpapers To Go, Inc., Wicks 'N' Sticks, Inc., Debtors.

Court:United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.

Date published: Feb 12, 1993

Citations

150 B.R. 663 (Bankr. S.D. Tex. 1993)

Citing Cases

In re Scott

Caplin & Drysdale Chartered v. Babcock & Wilcox Co. (In re Babcock & Wilcox Co.), 526 F.3d 824, 827 (5th…

In re McCollom Interests, LLC

This Court has an independent duty to examine all fee requests made by counsel. In re WNS, Inc., 150 B.R.…