Opinion
Delivered July 10, 1995
On December 12, 1994, we submitted by per curiam order proposals prepared by the Arkansas Supreme Court Committees on Civil and Criminal Practice to divide the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure into Civil and Criminal sections. This was part of a plan to remove from the Arkansas Rules of Criminal Procedure those rules pertaining to appeals and place them, as revised, in the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure. We asked for comment from the bench and bar and stated that the Rules would become effective January 15, 1995, unless altered by further order. On February 13, 1995, we published a second per curiam order extending the time for comment from the bench and bar to May 1, 1995.
We hereby adopt the Revised Rules of Appellate Procedure, to be effective on January 1, 1996. ARKANSAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE — CRIMINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS
Rule 1. Right of Appeal
Rule 2. Sentencing and Entry of Judgment
Rule 3. Time and Method of Taking Appeal
Rule 4. Appeal by State
Rule 5. Time for Filing Record, Contents of Record
Rule 6. No Bond for Cost
Rule 7. Bail on Appeal
Rule 8. Appeal after Confinement
Rule 9. Exceptions and Motion for New Trial Unnecessary
Rule 10. Other Remedies Not Abolished
Rule 11. Acquittal Barring Prosecution
Rule 12. Affirmance of Death Sentence; Procedure
Rule 13. Proceedings on Reversal
Rule 14. Deduction of Confinement under Prior Conviction
Rule 15. Judgment for Costs
Rule 16. Matters to be Considered on Appeal
Rule 17. Action to be Taken on Appeal
Rule 18. Trial Counsel's Duties with Regard to Appeal
Rule 19. Time Extension when Last Day for Action on Saturday, Sunday or Holiday
Rule 20. Uniform Paper Size
RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE — CRIMINAL
Rule 1. RIGHT OF APPEAL
(a) Right of Appeal. Any person convicted of a misdemeanor or a felony by virtue of trial in any circuit court of this state has the right to appeal to the Arkansas Court of Appeals or to the Supreme Court of Arkansas. An appeal may be taken jointly by co-defendants or by any defendant jointly charged and convicted with another defendant, and only one (1) appeal need be taken where a defendant has been found guilty of one (1) or more charges at a single trial. Except as provided by A.R.Cr.P. 24.3(b) there shall be no appeal from a plea of guilty or nolo contendere. [Amended by Per Curiam July 13, 1987, effective October 1, 1987.]
(b) Precedence. Appeals in criminal cases shall take precedence over all other business of the Supreme Court. Appeals under R.A.P. Civ. 2(a)(6), (7), and (9) shall take next precedence in the Supreme Court.
(c) Death of Defendant. No appeal shall be taken after defendant's death, and upon his death an appeal taken during his life shall abate and shall not be revived.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 1 (1995): Subsection (a) is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.1 modified only by substituting "A.R.Cr.P. 24.3" for "Rule 24.3." The first sentence of subsection (b) is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.2. The second sentence is former R.A.P. 2(c) slightly modified. Subsection (c) is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.3.
Rule 2. SENTENCING AND ENTRY OF JUDGMENT
Upon the return of a verdict of guilty in a case tried by a jury, or a finding of guilty in a case tried by a circuit court without a jury, sentence may be pronounced and the judgment of the court may be then and there entered, or sentencing and the entry of the judgment may be postponed to a date certain then fixed by the court, not more than thirty (30) days thereafter, at which time probation reports may be submitted, matters of mitigation presented or any other matter heard that the court or the defendant might deem appropriate to consider before the pronouncement of sentence and entry of the formal judgment. The defendant may file a written demand for immediate sentencing, whereupon the trial judge may cause formal sentence and judgment to be made of record. At the time sentence is pronounced and judgment entered, the trial judge must advise the defendant of his right to appeal, the period of time prescribed for perfecting the appeal, and either fix or deny bond. [Amended by Per Curiam May 30, 1989, effective July 1, 1989; Amended by Per Curiam dated Oct. 29, 1990, effective Jan. 1, 1991.]
Reporter's Notes to Rule 2 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.4, with grammatical changes. Rule 3. TIME AND METHOD OF TAKING APPEAL
(a) Notice of Appeal. Within thirty (30) days from
(1) the date of entry of a judgment; or
(2) the date of entry of an order denying a post-trial motion under R.A.P. Crim. 10; or
(3) the date a post-trial motion under R.A.P. Crim. 10 is deemed denied pursuant to R.A.P. Civ. 4(c); or
(4) the date of entry of an order denying a petition for postconviction relief under A.R.Cr.P. 37,
the person desiring to appeal the judgment or order or both shall file with the trial court a notice of appeal identifying the parties taking the appeal and the judgment or order or both appealed.
(b) Time for Filing. A notice of appeal is invalid if filed at any time prior to the day that the judgment or order appealed from is entered or prior to the day that a post-trial motion is deemed denied except as provided herein. If a notice of appeal is filed on the same day that the judgment or order appealed from is entered or on the day that a post-trial motion is deemed denied, the notice of appeal shall be effective. A notice of appeal filed within thirty (30) days of entry of the judgment of conviction shall be effective to appeal the judgment, even if a post-trial motion is subsequently filed. If a post-trial motion is filed after the notice of appeal, it shall not be necessary, to preserve the appeal of the judgment of conviction, to file another notice of appeal of the judgment. If an appellant wishes to appeal an adverse ruling on a post-trial motion and the appellant has previously filed a notice of appeal of the judgment, the appellant must file a notice of appeal regarding the ruling on the motion within the time provided in subpart (a)(2) or (3) hereof.
(c) Certificate That Transcript Ordered. The notice of appeal shall include either a certificate by the appealing party or his attorney that a transcript of the trial record has been ordered from the court reporter or a petition to obtain the record as a pauper if, for the purposes of the appeal, a transcript is deemed essential to resolve the issues on appeal. It shall not be necessary to file with either the notice of appeal or the designation of contents of record any portion of the reporter's transcript of the evidence of proceedings.
(d) Notification of Parties. Notification of the filing of the notice of appeal shall be given to all other parties or their representatives involved in the cause by mailing a copy of the notice of appeal to the parties or their representatives and to the Attorney General, but failure to give such notification shall not affect the validity of the appeal.
(e) Failure to Pursue Appeal. Failure of the appellant to take any further steps to secure the review of the appealed conviction shall not affect the validity of the appeal but shall be ground only for such action as the Supreme Court deems appropriate, which may include dismissal of the appeal. The Supreme Court may act upon and decide a case in which the notice of appeal was not given or the transcript of the trial record was not filed in the time prescribed, when a good reason for the omission is shown by affidavit. However, no motion for belated appeal shall be entertained by the Supreme Court unless application has been made to the Supreme Court within eighteen (18) months of the date of entry of judgment or entry of the order denying postconviction relief from which the appeal is taken. If no judgment of conviction was entered of record within ten (10) days of the date sentence was pronounced, application for belated appeal must be made within eighteen (18) months of the date sentence was pronounced.
(f) Dismissal of Appeal. If an appeal has not been docketed in the Supreme Court, the parties, with the approval of the trial court, may dismiss the appeal by stipulation filed in that court or that court may dismiss the appeal upon a motion and notice by the appellant. [Amended by per curiam October 25, 1976; amended December 18, 1978; amended by per curiam January 25, 1988, effective March 1, 1988; amended by per curiam January 31, 1994.]
Court's Comment to Rule 3(b) (1995): Rule 3(b) makes clear that a notice of appeal filed on the same day as the judgment or order is effective, even though filed on that day before the judgment or order appealed from.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 3 (November, 1994): Rule 3 is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.9. Subsection (b) has been modified to address cases where both a notice of appeal and a post-trial motion are filed. The subsection changes present law, under which a notice of appeal is invalid if filed before the entry of an order denying a post-trial motion or before the motion is "deemed denied" under R.A.P. Civ. 4(c). See Kelly v. Kelly, 310 Ark. 244, 835 S.W.2d 869 (1992); Kimble v. Gray, 313 Ark. 373, 853 S.W.2d 890 (1993) (per curiam), affirming Kimble v. Gray, 40 Ark. App. 196, 842 S.W.2d 473 (1992). See, also, Giacona v. State, 311 Ark. 664, 846 S.W.2d 185 (1993) (per curiam).
The second sentence of subsection (c) of this rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.18.
This rule applies in A.R.Cr.P. 37 cases only as to appeals from an actual denial of the Rule 37 petition: the "deemed denied" provision of R.A.P. Civ. 4(c) does not apply to Rule 37 petitions.
Court's Comment to January 1994 Amendment: The 1993 amendment was adopted to clarify that if a post-trial motion in the nature of a motion for a new trial or amendment of judgment is not resolved by the trial court within 30 days from the date of its filing, it is deemed denied under A.R.A.P. 4(c), and an appeal must be taken within 30 days from the date the motion is deemed denied. The amended rule also provides that the "deemed denied" principle does not apply to A.R.Cr.P. 37 petitions. Appeals may be taken within 30 days after a Rule 37 petition is actually denied by the trial court irrespective of whether that denial occurs more than 30 days after the petition is filed.
Reporter's Notes, 1988 Amendment: The phrase "or order denying postconviction relief" has been added to make it clear that the Supreme Court will accept a belated appeal of the denial of a petition for postconviction relief. See Garner v. State, 293 Ark. 309, 737 S.W.2d 637 (1987).
Note that the reference to filing a motion for belated appeal in the trial court has been deleted because the Supreme Court has held that such a motion must be filed directly in the Supreme Court because only the Supreme Court has the authority to grant a belated appeal. Gray v. State, 277 Ark. 442, 642 S.W.2d 306 (1982); Hamman v. State, 270 Ark. 307, 605 S.W.2d 6 (1980). The reference to the trial court in the current rule has resulted in confusion for both attorneys and pro se movants as to the court in which to file a motion for belated appeal.
The word "commitment" in Rule 36.9 [now Rule 3] also creates confusion since it is open to several interpretations and has not been defined by the Supreme Court. Some circuit judges, attorneys and pro se movants treat "commitment" as meaning the date judgment was entered of record in the circuit clerk's office. Others assume it to be the date sentence was pronounced by the circuit judge or the date the judge signed the judgment, regardless of when, or if, the judgment was ever filed. Still others interpret "commitment" to mean the date the convicted defendant was physically taken into custody by an officer of the Arkansas Department of Correction. (Under this interpretation, a defendant who was released on appeal bond without a notice of appeal having been filed has an advantage since this defendant's time for filing a belated appeal would not begin to run until he was taken into custody, giving him longer to proceed under the rule than the defendant who went straight to prison. This situation, while infrequent, has occurred and can be prevented by changing the rule to read "entry of judgment" rather than "commitment.")
The phrase "or entry of the order denying postconviction relief from which the appeal is taken" has been added because, as stated, Rule 36.9 does not currently indicate that there may be a belated appeal from a petition for postconviction relief.
"If no judgment of conviction was entered of record within ten (10) days of the date sentence was pronounced, application for belated appeal must be made within eighteen (18) months of the date sentence was pronounced" has been added to cover those instances where there is either no filemarked judgment from which to calculate or there was a delay of more than ten days in filing the judgment.
Rule 4. APPEAL BY STATE
(a) An interlocutory appeal on behalf of the state may be taken only from a pretrial order in a felony prosecution which (1) grants a motion under A.R.Cr.P. 16.2 to suppress seized evidence or (2) suppresses a defendant's confession. The prosecuting attorney shall file, within ten (10) days after the entering of the order, a notice of appeal together with a certificate that the appeal is not taken for the purposes of delay and that the order substantially prejudices the prosecution of the case. Further proceedings in the trial court shall be stayed pending determination of the appeal.
(b) Where an appeal, other than an interlocutory appeal, is desired on behalf of the state following either a misdemeanor or felony prosecution, the prosecuting attorney shall file a notice of appeal within thirty (30) days after entry of a final order by the trial judge.
(c) When a notice of appeal is filed pursuant to either subsection (a) or (b) of this rule, the clerk of the court in which the prosecution sought to be appealed took place shall immediately cause a transcript of the trial record to be made and transmitted to the attorney general, or delivered to the prosecuting attorney, to be by him delivered to the attorney general. If the attorney general, on inspecting the trial record, is satisfied that error has been committed to the prejudice of the state, and that the correct and uniform administration of the criminal law requires review by the Supreme Court, he may take the appeal by filing the transcript of the trial record with the clerk of the Supreme Court within sixty (60) days after the filing of the notice of appeal.
(d) A decision by the Arkansas Supreme Court sustaining in its entirety an order appealed under subsection (a) hereof shall bar further proceedings against the defendant on the charge. [Amended June 7, 1976, effective July 7, 1976; amended by Per Curiam February 14, 1983.]
Reporter's Notes to Rule 4 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.10.
Court's Comment to February 1983 Amendment: Paragraph (a) of this Rule, as amended, in conjunction with paragraph (d), limits interlocutory appeals by the state to the two specified situations and contemplates that the suppressed evidence or confession must be essential to the prosecution of the case.
Rule 5. TIME FOR FILING RECORD, CONTENTS OF RECORD
(a) Generally. Matters pertaining to several appeals, the docketing, designation, abbreviation, stipulation, preparation, and correction or modification of the record on appeal, as well as appeals where no stenographic record was made, shall be governed by the Rules of Appellate Procedure — Civil and any statutes presently in force which apply to civil cases on appeal to the Supreme Court.
(b) Exhibits. All exhibits in the trial of any criminal case shall be a part of the record on appeal unless specifically omitted by the appealing party without objection by the adverse party.
(c) Record For Preliminary Hearing in Supreme Court. Prior to the time the complete record on appeal is settled and certified as herein provided, any appealing party may docket the appeal in order to make in the Supreme Court a motion for dismissal, for a stay pending appeal, for fixing or reduction of bail, to proceed in forma pauperis, or for any intermediate order. The clerk of the trial court, at the request of the appealing party, shall certify and transmit to the Supreme Court a copy of such portion of the record of proceedings as may be available or needed for the purpose.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 5 (1995): Subsection (a) of this rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.23 slightly modified by adding a reference to the Rules of Appellate Procedure — Civil. Most of the statutes once applying to civil appeals have been superseded. See Ark. Code Ann. §§ 16-67-301 et seq. (Michie 1987 and Michie Supp. 1993); In the Matter of Statutes Deemed Superseded by the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure, 290 Ark. 616, 719 S.W.2d 436 (1986) (per curiam).
Subsection (b) of this rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.19.
Subsection (c) of this rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.20.
Rule 6. NO BOND FOR COSTS
There shall be no bond for costs as a prerequisite for the appeal of either a felony or misdemeanor conviction.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 6 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.17. In the title, "cost" has been changed to "costs." Rule 7. BAIL ON APPEAL
(a) The appeal bond provided for in this rule shall be filed in the office of the clerk of the court in which the conviction is had, and a copy thereof shall be attached to the bill of exceptions and shall be made a part of the transcript to be filed in the Supreme Court.
(b)(1) When a defendant has been found guilty, pleaded guilty, or pleaded nolo contendere to an offense other than one specified in subsection (b)(2) or (b)(3) of this section, and he is sentenced to serve a term of imprisonment, and he has filed a notice of appeal, the trial court shall not release the defendant on bail or otherwise pending appeal unless it finds:
(A) By clear and convincing evidence that the defendant is not likely to flee or that there is no substantial risk that the defendant will commit a serious crime, intimidate witnesses, harass or take retaliatory action against any juror, or otherwise interfere with the administration of justice or pose a danger to the safety of any other person; and
(B) That the appeal is not for the purpose of delay and that it raises a substantial question of law or fact.
(2) When the defendant has been found guilty, pleaded guilty, or pleaded nolo contendere to capital murder, the trial court shall not release the defendant on bail or otherwise, pending appeal or for any reason.
(3) When the defendant has been found guilty, pleaded guilty, or pleaded nolo contendere to murder in the first degree, rape, aggravated robbery, or causing a catastrophe, or kidnapping or arson when classified as a Class Y felony, and he has been sentenced to death or imprisonment, the trial court shall not release him on bail or otherwise, pending appeal or for any reason.
(c)(1) If an appeal bond is granted by the trial court, it shall be conditioned on the defendant's surrendering himself to the sheriff of the county in which the trial was held upon the dismissal of the appeal or upon the rendition of final judgment upon the appeal. The trial court may also condition release by imposing restrictions specified in A.R.Cr.P. 9.3 or other restrictions found reasonably necessary.
(2) Following the affirmance or reversal of a conviction, the Clerk of the Supreme Court shall immediately make and forward to the clerk of the circuit court of the county in which the defendant was convicted a certified copy of the mandate of the Supreme Court.
(3) The circuit clerk, upon receipt of a mandate affirming the conviction, shall immediately file the mandate and notify the sheriff and the bail bondsman or, in appropriate cases, other sureties on the bail bond that the defendant should be surrendered to the sheriff as required by the terms of the bail bond.
(4) If the defendant fails to surrender himself to the sheriff in compliance with the conditions of his bond, the sheriff shall notify the clerk of the circuit court, and the circuit court shall direct that fact to be entered on its records and shall adjudge the bail bond of the defendant, or the money deposited in lieu thereof, to be forfeited.
(5) The defendant having failed to surrender, the circuit clerk shall immediately issue a summons against the sureties on the bail bond requiring them to appear and show cause why judgment should not be rendered against them for the sum specified in the bail bond on account of the forfeiture thereof, which summons shall be made returnable and shall be executed as in civil actions, and the action shall be docketed and shall proceed as an ordinary civil action.
(6) The summons may be served as provided by law in any place in which the sureties may be found, and the service of the summons on the defendant or defendants shall give the court complete jurisdiction of the defendant and cause.
(7) No pleadings on the part of the state shall be required in such cases.
(d) The circuit court in which the defendant was convicted shall retain jurisdiction to hear and decide any motion to revoke the bail of a defendant set at liberty pursuant to this rule, even if the record on appeal has been lodged with the Supreme Court or the Court of Appeals.
(e) If the court in which the defendant was convicted refuses to grant an appeal bond, and an appeal bond shall thereafter be granted by any Justice or Justices of the Supreme Court, the bond shall be conditioned that, upon the dismissal of the appeal or the rendition of the final judgment therein by the Supreme Court, the defendant shall surrender himself as provided in this rule in execution of the judgment. [Amended by Per Curiam March 27, 1995.]
Reporter's Notes to Rule 7 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.5. In March 1994, the General Assembly enacted 1994 Ark. Acts 3, First Extraordinary Session. The act, which governed bail on appeal after conviction, was struck down by the Arkansas Supreme Court in Casement v. State, 318 Ark. 225, 884 S.W.2d 593 (1994), the Court having found that the act conflicted with post-conviction appeal procedures established by rules of the Court.
Rule 7 is, in essence, Act 3, modified to eliminate the requirement that a defendant free on bail pending appeal surrender to the Arkansas Supreme Court upon the affirmance of his conviction. Under this rule the defendant is to surrender to the sheriff of the county in which the defendant was convicted.
The term "bail bond" in subsection (a) of the act has been replaced by "appeal bond" in subpart(a) of the rule. In addition, subpart (b)(1) of the rule, restating subsection (b)(1) of Act 3, has been modified to speak of filing "a notice of appeal" rather than "an appeal," it being reasonably clear that this was the intent of the Act 3's drafters.
Subpart (c)(1) of the rule, restating subsection (c)(1) of Act 3, has been amended to speak of the circuit court's granting an "appeal bond" rather than "the appeal." Guidelines for imposing conditions of release have been included.
Subpart (d) vests jurisdiction to hear revocation motions in the circuit court.
Subpart (e), restating subsection (d)(1) of Act 3, has been amended to speak of the trial court's granting "an appeal bond," not "an appeal." The rule contains no counterpart of subsection (d)(2) of the act, which was viewed as surplusage.
Finally, language clarifying the procedure to be followed by the Clerk of the Supreme Court and circuit clerks has been added.
Rule 7 will supersede A.R.Cr.P. 36.5 through 36.8.
Rule 8. APPEAL AFTER CONFINEMENT
If a judgment of confinement in a detentional facility operated by the state has been executed before notice of appeal is given, the defendant shall remain in the detentional facility during the pendency of the appeal, unless discharged by the expiration of his term of confinement or by pardon or parole, or admitted to bail by the trial court prior to the docketing of the appeal in the Supreme Court. If the trial court or a Justice or Justices of the Supreme Court admit the defendant to bail pending appeal, the commitment by which the sentence was carried into execution may be recalled. Upon a reversal, if a new trial is ordered, the defendant shall be removed from the detentional facility and returned to the custody of the sheriff of the county in which the sentence was imposed. [Amended by Per Curiam December 18, 1978.]
Reporter's Notes to Rule 8 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.13, with grammatical changes.
Rule 9. EXCEPTIONS AND MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL UNNECESSARY
Motions for New Trial. It shall not be necessary to file a motion for new trial to obtain review of any matter on appeal. If a motion for new trial is submitted to the trial court, on appeal the appellant shall not be restricted to a consideration of matters assigned therein. Formal exceptions to rulings or orders of the trial court are unnecessary; but for all purposes for which an exception has heretofore been necessary it is sufficient that a party, at the time the ruling or order of the court is made or sought, makes known to the court the action which he desires the court to take or his objections to the action of the court and his grounds therefore; and, if a party has no opportunity to object to a ruling or order at the time it is made, the absence of an objection does not thereafter prejudice him.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 9 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.21(a). Rule 10. OTHER REMEDIES NOT ABOLISHED
A person convicted of either a felony or misdemeanor may file a motion for new trial, a motion in arrest of judgment, or any other application for relief, but all motions or applications must be filed prior to the time fixed to file a notice of appeal. Such pleadings should include a statement that the movant believes the action to be meritorious and is not offered for the purpose of delay. A copy of any such motion shall be served on the representative of the prosecuting party. The trial court shall designate a date certain, if a hearing is requested or found to be necessary, to take evidence, hear, and determine all of the matters presented within ten (10) days of the filing of any motion or application unless circumstances justify that the hearing or determination be delayed. Upon the filing of any motion or other application for relief in the trial court, the time to file a notice of appeal shall not expire until thirty (30) days after the disposition of all motions or applications.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 10 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.22.
Rule 11. ACQUITTAL BARRING PROSECUTION
A judgment in favor of the defendant that operates as a bar to future prosecution of the offense shall not be reversed by the Supreme Court.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 11 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.11. This rule does not bar an appeal by the state of a trial court's granting of a defendant's motion for judgment notwithstanding a jury's verdict of guilty. See State v. Schaub, 310 Ark. 76, 832 S.W.2d 843 (1992), where the Arkansas Supreme Court, without citing this rule, held that the state can appeal a trial court's grant of a defendant's motion for a judgment notwithstanding the jury's verdict of guilty because such an appeal by the State, if successful, results in reinstatement of the verdict of guilty and does not subject the defendant to a second trial. Rule 12. AFFIRMANCE OF DEATH SENTENCE; PROCEDURE
When a judgment of death has been affirmed, a petition under A.R.Cr.P. 37 has been denied, or a mandate has been returned from the United States Supreme Court, and the day of execution has passed, the Clerk of the Supreme Court shall transmit to the Governor a certificate of the affirmance, denial or return of mandate and judgment, to the end that a warrant for the execution of the judgment may be issued by the Governor. Such certificate shall operate to dissolve any stay of execution previously entered by the Supreme Court. [Amended by Per Curiam July 6, 1981.]
Reporter's Notes to Rule 12 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.12, with grammatical changes and amended only by the addition of the last sentence to make it clear that stays are dissolved automatically when either the Arkansas Supreme Court or the United States Supreme Court affirms a judgment of death.
Rule 13. PROCEEDINGS ON REVERSAL
Upon a mandate of reversal ordering a new trial being filed in the clerk's office of the circuit court in which the judgment of confinement in the penitentiary was rendered and executed, the clerk shall deliver to the sheriff a copy of the mandate and precept, authorizing and commanding him to bring the defendant from the penitentiary to the county jail, which shall be obeyed by the sheriff and keeper of the penitentiary.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 13 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.14, with grammatical changes.
Rule 14. DEDUCTION OF CONFINEMENT UNDER PRIOR CONVICTION
If the defendant upon the new trial is again convicted, the period of his former confinement in the penitentiary shall be deducted by the court from the period of confinement fixed in the last verdict of conviction.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 14 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.15. Rule 15. JUDGMENT FOR COSTS
On the affirmance of a judgment, where the appeal is taken by the defendant, and on the reversal of an appealable order where the appeal is taken by the state, a judgment for costs shall be rendered against the defendant.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 15 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.16.
Rule 16. MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED ON APPEAL
The Supreme Court need only review those matters briefed and argued by the appellant, provided that where either a sentence for life imprisonment or death has been imposed, the Supreme Court shall review the entire record for errors prejudicial to the right of the appellant.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 16 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.24 altered only by grammatical changes.
Rule 17. ACTION TO BE TAKEN ON APPEAL
A conviction shall be reversed and a new trial ordered where the Supreme Court finds that the conviction is contrary to the Constitution or the laws of Arkansas, or for any reason determines that the appellant did not have a fair trial. Where appropriate, the Supreme Court shall reverse the conviction and order the appellant discharged. In all other cases, the conviction must be affirmed or affirmed as modified.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 17 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.25. The last sentence has been amended to explicitly recognize the Supreme Court's authority to affirm a conviction as modified.
Rule 18. TRIAL COUNSEL'S DUTIES WITH REGARD TO APPEAL
Trial counsel, whether retained or court appointed, shall continue to represent a convicted defendant throughout any appeal to the Arkansas Supreme Court, unless permitted by the trial court or the Arkansas Supreme Court to withdraw in the interest of justice or for other sufficient cause. After the notice of appeal of a judgment of conviction has been filed, the Supreme Court shall have exclusive jurisdiction to relieve counsel and appoint new counsel.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 18 (1995): This rule is former A.R.Cr.P. 36.26, amended to specify when the Supreme Court's authority to relieve counsel begins.
Rule 19. TIME EXTENSION WHEN LAST DAY FOR
ACTION ON SATURDAY, SUNDAY OR HOLIDAY
Whenever the last day for taking any action under these rules or under the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the time for such action shall be extended to the next business day. [Adopted May 5, 1980].
Reporter's Notes to Rule 19 (1995): This rule is former R.A.P. 9.
Rule 20. UNIFORM PAPER SIZE
All notices of appeal, motions, orders, records, transcripts, and other papers required or authorized by these rules shall be on an 8-1/2" x 11" paper. [Adopted by Per Curiam May 15, 1989.]
Reporter's Notes to Rule 20 (1995): This rule is former R.A.P. 10. Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure
1. The Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure are hereby repealed and replaced with two sets of rules: the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure — Civil and the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure — Criminal.
2. The Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure — Civil and accompanying Reporter's Notes are as follows:
ARKANSAS RULES OF APPELLATE PROCEDURE — CIVIL
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Rule 1. Scope of Rules
Rule 2. Appealable Matters; Priority
Rule 3. Appeal — How Taken
Rule 4. Appeal — When Taken
Rule 5. Record — Time for Filing
Rule 6. Record on Appeal
Rule 7. Certification and Transmission of Record
Rule 8. Stay Pending Appeal
Rule 9. Time Extension when Last Day for Action Falls on Saturday, Sunday, or Holiday
Rule 10. Uniform Paper Size
Rule 1. SCOPE OF RULES
These rules shall govern the procedure in civil appeals to the Arkansas Supreme Court or Court of Appeals. Whenever the words Supreme Court appear in these rules, the words Court of Appeals shall be substituted in applying the rules in a case in which jurisdiction of the appeal is in the Court of Appeals under Rule 1-2 of the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 1 (1994): This rule is a slightly modified version of former Appellate Rule 1. The word "civil" has been added to the first sentence to make clear that these rules apply only to appeals in civil cases. The Reporter's Notes prepared in connection with former Appellate Rule 1 are set out below.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 1: 1. This rule makes it clear that these rules apply only to appeals to the Arkansas Supreme Court. They have no applicability to appeals from municipal, county, small claims courts, etc.
2. The Committee did not deem it necessary to draft comprehensive rules dealing with the procedure after the Arkansas Supreme Court has acquired jurisdiction of a particular case. The Supreme Court has periodically revised its own rules with the result that little or no change is necessary at that level. These appellate rules are basically a revision and condensation of prior Arkansas statutory law as it affected procedures prior to the time the Supreme Court acquired jurisdiction. Thus, these rules are much less comprehensive than the federal appellate rules.
Rule 2. APPEALABLE MATTERS; PRIORITY
(a) An appeal may be taken from a circuit, chancery, or probate court to the Arkansas Supreme Court from:
1. A final judgment or decree entered by the trial court;
2. An order which in effect determines the action and prevents a judgment from which an appeal might be taken, or discontinues the action;
3. An order which grants or refuses a new trial;
4. An order which strikes out an answer, or any part of an answer, or any pleading in an action;
5. An order which vacates or sustains an attachment or garnishment;
6. An interlocutory order by which an injunction is granted, continued, modified, refused, or dissolved, or by which an application to dissolve or modify an injunction is refused;
7. An interlocutory order appointing a receiver, or refusing to wind up a pending receivership or to take the appropriate steps to accomplish the purposes thereof, such as directing a sale or other disposal of property held thereunder;
8. An order which disqualifies an attorney from further participation in the case;
9. An order granting or denying a motion to certify a case as a class action in accordance with Rule 23 of the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure.
(b) An appeal from any final order also brings up for review any intermediate order involving the merits and necessarily affecting the judgment.
(c) Appeals in criminal cases have priority over all other business of the Supreme Court. With respect to civil cases, appeals under subdivisions (a)(6), (a)(7), and (a)(9) of this rule take precedence.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 2 (1995): This rule is virtually identical to former Appellate Rule 2, although the title has been changed to more accurately reflect its content. Subdivision (c) has been modified to expressly include the statement that criminal appeals take precedence in the Supreme Court, as was the case under former Rule 36.2 of the Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Reporter's Notes prepared in connection with former Appellate Rule 2 are set out below.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 2: 1. Act 38 of 1973, authorizing the Supreme Court to prescribe rules of civil procedure, provides that rights of appeal shall continue as authorized by law. Accordingly, in this rule the Court has preserved rights of appeal as conferred by superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2101 (Supp. 1971), superseded § 27-2102 (Repl. 1962), and superseded § 31-165 (Repl. 1962). If, at the effective date of these rules, there are other statutes conferring rights of appeal from trial courts, they are not intended to be superseded.
2. An order dismissing a writ of garnishment is appealable. Bank of Eudora v. Ross, 168 Ark. 754, 271 S.W. 703 (1925).
Addition to Reporter's Notes, 1985 Amendment: Subsection (9) is added to Rule 2(a) to permit appeal to the Supreme Court of an order certifying a case as a class action under Rule 23, Ark. R. Civ. P. See Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Nesheim, 285 Ark. 253, 686 S.W.2d 777 (1985). The Supreme Court has previously held that an order denying class certification is appealable under Rule 2. Drew v. First Federal Savings Loan Ass'n, 271 Ark. 667, 610 S.W.2d 876 (1981). In contrast, neither type of order is immediately appealable in the federal courts. See Coopers Lybrand v. Livesay, 437 U.S. 473 [ 437 U.S. 463] (1978); Gardner v. Westinghouse Broadcasting Co., 437 U.S. 478 (1978).
Addition to Reporter's Notes, 1991 Amendment: Rule 2(a)(9) is amended to expressly permit an immediate appeal from any order denying a motion to certify a case as a class action, as well as from an order granting such certification. The Supreme Court has held that both types of orders may be immediately appealed. See Ford Motor Credit Co. v. Nesheim, 285 Ark. 253, 686 S.W.2d 777 (1985); Drew v. First Federal Savings Loan Ass'n, 271 Ark. 667, 610 S.W.2d 876 (1981). However, Rule 2(a)(9) has heretofore specifically dealt only with orders granting class certification. Rule 2(c) is amended to add appeals under Rule 2(a)(9) to the list of those that "take precedence," since appeals of orders granting or denying class certification are interlocutory in nature.
Rule 3. APPEAL — HOW TAKEN
(a) Mode of Obtaining Review. The mode of bringing a judgment, decree or order to the Arkansas Supreme Court for review shall be by appeal.
(b) How Taken. An appeal shall be taken by filing a notice of appeal with the clerk of the court which entered the judgment, decree, or order from which the appeal is taken. Failure of the appellant or cross-appellant to take any further steps to secure review of the judgment or decree appealed from shall not affect the validity of the appeal or cross-appeal, but shall be ground only for such action as the Supreme Court deems appropriate, which may include dismissal of the appeal or cross-appeal. If, however, the record on appeal has not been filed pursuant to Rule 5 of these rules, the trial court in which the notice of appeal was filed may dismiss the appeal or cross-appeal upon petition of all parties to the appeal or cross-appeal accompanied by a joint stipulation that the appeal or cross-appeal is to be dismissed.
(c) Joint or Consolidated Appeals. If two or more persons are entitled to appeal and their interests are such as to make joinder practicable, they may file a joint notice of appeal or may join in the appeal after filing separate, timely notices of appeal and they may thereafter proceed on appeal as a single appellant. Appeals may be consolidated by order of the Supreme Court upon its own motion or upon motion of a party.
(d) Cross-Appeals. A cross-appeal may be taken by filing a notice of cross-appeal with the clerk of the court which entered the judgment, decree or order being appealed.
(e) Content of Notice of Appeal or Cross-Appeal. A notice of appeal or cross-appeal shall specify the party or parties taking the appeal; shall designate the judgment, decree, order or part thereof appealed from and shall designate the contents of the record on appeal. The notice shall also contain a statement that the transcript, or specific portions thereof, have been ordered by the appellant.
(f) Service of Notice of Appeal or Cross-Appeal. A copy of the notice of appeal or cross-appeal shall be served by counsel for appellant or cross-appellant upon counsel for all other parties by any form of mail which requires a signed receipt. If a party is not represented by counsel, notice shall be mailed to such party at his last known address. Failure to serve notice shall not affect the validity of the appeal.
(g) Abbreviated Record; Statement of Points. If the appellant does not designate for inclusion the complete record and all the proceedings and evidence in the action, he shall serve with his notice of appeal and designation a concise statement of the points on which he intends to rely on the appeal.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 3 (1995): With the exception of one minor revision for purposes of clarity, this rule is identical to former Appellate Rule 3. The single change is the addition of the phrase "of these rules" in subdivision (b). The Reporter's Notes prepared in connection with former Appellate Rule 3 are set out below.
Reporter's Notes (as revised by the Court) to Rule 3: 1. Rule 3 establishes the procedures for initiating an appeal to the Arkansas Supreme Court. This rule makes certain changes in prior Arkansas procedures, but these should have little effect on the overall appellate process. The significant changes are found in Sections (e) and (f). In Section (e), it is provided that the notice of appeal shall contain a designation of the record, as opposed to prior practice which required a separate instrument, and shall contain a statement that the transcript has been ordered. The latter statement is intended to expedite appeals. In Section (f), the responsibility for serving notice of filing a notice of appeal or cross-appeal is placed upon counsel for appellant or cross-appellant as opposed to the clerk. The notice must be by a form of mail which requires a signed receipt.
2. For the appellee's procedure for designating additional parts of the record when the appellant does not designate the entire record, see Rule 6(b).
3. Rule 3 makes no attempt to define or affect the Arkansas Supreme Court's power in matters of original jurisdiction under Ark. Stat. Ann. § 22-200(e) (Repl. 1977). The Court's authority in this area is not in any way abridged or enlarged by this or any other rule adopted herein.
4. Rule 3 supersedes Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 27-2103, 27-2106.1, 27-2106.2, and 27-2110.1 (Repl. 1962).
Addition to Reporter's Note, 1986 Amendment: Rule 3(b) is amended to incorporate provisions of statutes superseded when the rules of appellate procedure were adopted. The revised rule makes plain that the appellate court may, in its discretion, dismiss an appeal if the appellant has not taken the appropriate steps to secure review after filing the notice of appeal. However, if the record has not yet been filed in the appellate court, the trial court may dismiss the appeal upon stipulation of the parties or upon motion of either party. With respect to the latter provision, the rule represents a slight change in prior practice, under which dismissal in the trial court was by stipulation only and an appellee was required to file a partial record in the appellate court in order to move for dismissal there. See Norfleet v. Norfleet, 223 Ark. 751, 268 S.W.2d 387 (1954). Leaving the matter to the trial court when no record on appeal has been filed is consistent with Rule 5, which permits the trial court to extend the time for filing the record, and is perceived as less expensive and cumbersome than the prior practice.
Addition to Reporter's Notes, 1988 Amendment: Under the amendment, which revises the last sentence of Rule 3(b), the trial court has authority to dismiss an appeal before the record is docketed in the appellate court only if all parties so stipulate and petition the trial court for dismissal. Absent such a stipulation, a party wishing to dismiss an appeal must file a partial record in the appellate court and move for dismissal there. See Norfleet v. Norfleet, 223 Ark. 751, 268 S.W.2d 387 (1954). The amendment works a significant change in the rule, which, as amended in 1986, permitted the trial court to dismiss an appeal, prior to the docketing of the record, upon motion of a party.
Rule 4. APPEAL — WHEN TAKEN
(a) Time for Filing Notice. Except as otherwise provided in subsequent sections of this rule, a notice of appeal shall be filed within thirty (30) days from the entry of the judgment, decree or order appealed from. A notice of cross-appeal shall be filed within ten (10) days after receipt of the notice of appeal, except that in no event shall a cross-appellant have less than (30) days from the entry of the judgment, decree or order within which to file a notice of cross-appeal. Upon a showing of failure to receive notice of the judgment, decree or order from which appeal is sought, the trial court may extend the time for filing the notice of appeal by any party for a period not to exceed sixty (60) days from the expiration of the time otherwise prescribed by these rules. Such an extension may be granted before or after the time otherwise prescribed by these rules has expired; but if a request for an extension is made after such time has expired, it shall be made by motion with such notice as the court shall deem appropriate.
(b) Time for Notice of Appeal Extended by Timely Motion. Upon timely filing in the trial court of a motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict under Rule 50(b), of a motion to amend the court's findings of fact or to make additional findings under Rule 52(b), or of a motion for a new trial under Rule 59(b), the time for filing of notice of appeal shall be extended as provided in this rule.
(c) Disposition of Posttrial Motion. If a timely motion listed in section (b) of this rule is filed in the trial court by any party, the time for appeal for all parties shall run from the entry of the order granting or denying a new trial or granting or denying any other such motion. Provided, that if the trial court neither grants nor denies the motion within thirty (30) days of its filing, the motion will be deemed denied as of the 30th day. A notice of appeal filed before the disposition of any such motion or, if no order is entered, prior to the expiration of the 30-day period shall have no effect. A new notice of appeal must be filed within the prescribed time measured from the entry of the order disposing of the motion or from the expiration of the 30-day period. No additional fees shall be required for such filing.
(d) Time for Appeal from Disposition of Motion. Upon disposition of a motion listed in section (b) of this rule, any party desiring to appeal from the judgment, decree or order originally entered shall have (30) days from the entry of the order disposing of the motion or the expiration of the 30-day period provided in section (c) of this rule within which to give notice of appeal.
(e) When Judgment Is Entered. A judgment, decree or order is entered within the meaning of this rule when it is filed with the clerk of the court in which the claim was tried.
(f) Notice of Appeal Filed on Same Day. A notice of appeal filed on the same day as the judgment, decree, or order appealed from shall be effective.
Court's Comment to Rule 4(f) (1995): Rule 4(f) makes clear that a notice of appeal filed on the same day as the judgment, decree, or order is effective, even though filed on that day before the judgment, decree or order appealed from. The new rule overrules the holdings in Lawrence Bros., Inc. v. R.J. "Bob" Jones Excavating Contractor, Inc., 318 Ark. 328, 884 S.W.2d 620 (1994) (per curiam) and Kelly v. Kelly, 310 Ark. 244, 835 S.W.2d 869 (1992) (per curiam), to the extent those holdings invalidate notices of appeal filed on the same day but before the judgment, decree, or order appealed from.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 4 (1995): This rule tracks former Appellate Rule 4 without change. The Reporter's Notes prepared in connection with former Appellate Rule 4 are set out below.
Reporter's Notes (as revised by the Court) to Rule 4: 1. Rule 4 consolidates various superseded Arkansas statutes concerning the time for taking an appeal into one rule. Section (a) follows superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 21-2106.1 (Repl. 1962) insofar as a notice of appeal is concerned. A notice of cross-appeal must be filed within ten days after receipt of the notice of appeal, but in no event shall the cross-appellant have less than thirty days from entry of judgment within which to file his notice.
2. Section (b) does not follow the second paragraph of Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. It was believed that the federal rule permits excessive delay with respect to post-judgment motions that might be filed but not acted upon promptly. Consequently, Sections (b), (c) and (d) preserve the procedure that was prescribed by Act 123 of 1063. See superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2106.3 et seq. (Supp. 1977); St. Louis S.W. Ry. v. Farrell, 241 Ark. 707, 409 S.W.2d 341 (1966).
3. Under Federal Rule 4, the trial court is empowered to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal upon a showing of excusable neglect. No such provision is included in Rule 4 for the reason that Arkansas has long considered the filing of a notice of appeal as jurisdictional and unless timely filed, there can be no appeal. White v. Avery, 226 Ark. 951, 295 S.W.2d 364 (1956). The Committee saw no need to change this settled rule of law.
4. Section (e) incorporates in the rule the definition of the "entry" of a judgment that has been followed under superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2106.1 (Repl. 1962); Norfleet v. Norfleet, 223 Ark. 751, 268 S.W.2d 387 (1954).
Addition to Reporter's Note, 1986 Amendment: Rule 4(a) is amended to empower the trial court to extend the time for filing a notice of appeal when the party has not received notice of the entry of the judgment or order from which he seeks to appeal. The amendment represents a narrow exception to the rule that the filing of a notice of appeal is jurisdictional and, unless timely filed, there can be no appeal. White v. Avery, 226 Ark. 951, 291 S.W.2d 364 (1956). The change was deemed necessary to ensure fairness when counsel has not received notice of the entry of the judgment or other appealable order. Cf. Karam v. Halk, 260 Ark. 36, 537 S.W.2d 797 (1976). Although under longstanding Arkansas custom counsel have been given an opportunity to approve a judgment or order prepared by opposing counsel, circumstances have arisen where counsel did not receive that opportunity and did not otherwise receive notice that a judgment had been entered.
The reference in Rule 4(b) to Rule 59(f), Ark. R. Civ. P., was rendered obsolete when Rule 59(f) was deleted in 1983. See Reporter's Note, Rule 59(f). Moreover, a new Rule 59(f) was added in 1984, making the reference in Rule 4(b) even more confusing. This amendment deletes the language referring to Rule 59(f). Addition to Reporter's Notes, 1988 Amendment: Sections (c) and (d) of Rule 4 are amended significantly in an effort to simplify Arkansas appellate practice. The amended provisions are modeled on Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, though the federal practice has not been followed in all particulars. When the Arkansas Rules of Civil Procedure were promulgated in 1979, the federal approach with respect to judicial action on posttrial motions was not adopted for fear of excessive delay. It is now apparent, however, that precisely the same sort of delay occurs regularly under the more complex Arkansas rule, which also has become a trap for the unwary. The Arkansas practice has been further complicated by decisions construing Rule 4 in such a manner as to impose additional requirements not found on the face of the rule. E.g., Brittenum Assocs. v. Mayall, 286 Ark. 427, 692 S.W.2d 248 (1985). Thus, the 1988 amendment follows the more simplified procedure established in the federal rule, but adds a 30-day "window" for judicial action on posttrial motions to prevent problems with excessive delay. Under Rule 4(c), a motion is deemed denied if the trial court neither grants nor denies the motion within 30 days of its filing, and, under Rule 4(d), the time for filing the notice of appeal begins to run at the end of that 30-day period. If, however, an order granting or denying the motion is acted upon within the 30-day period, the time for filing the notice of appeal begins to run upon entry of the order.
Further, the 1988 amendment expands from 10 to 30 days the time period in Rule 4(d) for filing the notice of appeal when a posttrial motion has been made. This change, which makes consistent the time periods found in Rule 4(a) and 4(d), should eliminate confusion as to the time for filing the notice of appeal. Moreover, the amendment works an important change in prior Arkansas law. Because of the shorter time period contained previously in Rule 4(d), it was possible for an appellant to miss the 10-day deadline but still file a notice of appeal from the order denying the posttrial motion by complying with the 30-day period provided in Rule 4(a). E.g., Cornett v. Prather, 290 Ark. 262, 718 S.W.2d 433 (1986). In that event, the appellant could challenge only the trial court's action with respect to the posttrial motion and could not attack other errors underlying the judgment. Id. By establishing a uniform 30-day period for filing the notice of appeal, amended Rule 4(d) eliminates this possibility and is thus consistent with Rule 5(b), which provides that an appeal from an order disposing of a posttrial motion under Rule 4 "brings up for review the judgment, decree and any intermediate order involving the merits and necessarily affecting the judgment, as well as the order appealed from."
Rule 5. RECORD — TIME FOR FILING
(a) When Filed. The record on appeal shall be filed with the clerk of the Arkansas Supreme Court and docketed therein within 90 days from the filing of the first notice of appeal, unless the time is extended by order of the trial court as hereinafter provided. When, however, an appeal is taken from an interlocutory order under Rule 2(a)(6) or (7), the record must be filed with the clerk of the Supreme Court within thirty (30) days from the entry of such order.
(b) Extension of Time. In cases where there has been designated for inclusion any evidence or proceeding at the trial or hearing which was stenographically reported, the trial court, upon finding that a reporter's transcript of such evidence or proceeding has been ordered by appellant, and upon a further finding that an extension is necessary for the inclusion in the record of evidence or proceedings stenographically reported, may extend the time for filing the record on appeal, but the order of extension must be entered before the expiration of the period for filing as originally prescribed or extended by a previous order. In no event shall the time be extended more than seven (7) months from the date of the entry of the judgment, decree or order, or from the date on which a timely postjudgment motion under Rule 4(b) is deemed to have been disposed of under Rule 4(c), whichever is later. An appeal from an order disposing of a postjudgment motion under Rule 4 brings up for review the judgment, decree and any intermediate order involving the merits and necessarily affecting the judgment, as well as the order appealed from. Counsel seeking an extension shall give to opposing counsel notice of the application for an extension of time.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 5 (1995): This rule tracks former Appellate Rule 5 without change. The Reporter's Notes prepared in connection with former Appellate Rule 5 are set out below. Reporter's Notes (as revised by the Court) to Rule 5: 1. Rule 5 is a slightly revised version of superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2127.1 (Supp. 1975) and superseded Rule 26A of the Arkansas Supreme Court Rules. Only minor wording changes are made and the substance of prior Arkansas law remains unchanged. Under Section (b), the order extending the time must actually be filed prior to the expiration of the time for filing the record, whereas under prior Arkansas law, the order of extension needed only to have been made within the time allowed and not necessarily filed.
2. The 30-day limitation for the filing of the record in appeals is taken from superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-1202 (Repl. 1962).
Addition to Reporter's Notes, 1985 Amendment: 1. The next to last sentence of Rule 5(b) is amended to eliminate confusion that had existed regarding the interplay between Rule 4, which governs the filing of the notice of appeal, and Rule 5, which governs the time for filing the record with the clerk of the Supreme Court. As amended, Rule 5(b) provides that the time for filing the record may not be extended more than seven months from either (a) the date of entry of judgment or order, or (2) the date on which a timely postjudgment motion under Rule 4(b) has been deemed disposed of under Rule 4(c), whichever is later. See Pentron Corp. v. Delta Steel Constr. Co., 286 Ark. 91, 689 S.W.2d 539 (1985).
Addition to Reporter's Note, 1986 Amendment: The new language is designed to address a problem stemming from the relationship between Appellate Rules 4 and 5. Under prior practice and under certain circumstances, Rule 5 required that the record on appeal be filed before Rule 4(c) required the filing of a notice of appeal in the trial court. See Yent v. State, 279 Ark. 268, 650 S.W.2d 577 (1983) (concurring opinion). While the most recent amendment to Rule 5(b) was aimed at this anomaly, difficulties persist when the postjudgment motion is (1) limited to a single issue, although other errors are to be presented on appeal, and (2) the trial court properly takes under advisement such a motion. In such a situation, counsel for the appellant must lodge the record on appeal within seven months from the date of the original judgment in order to preserve an error not raised in the motion for new trial, even though the time for filing the notice of appeal would not begin to run until disposition of the motion, which under Rule 4(c) could occur more than seven months after entry of judgment. Under the amended rule, however, an appeal from the order disposing of the motion raises not only the issue presented by the motion, but also other issues properly preserved at trial. The time for filing the record on appeal would run from disposition of the motion.
Rule 6. RECORD ON APPEAL
(a) Composition of Record. The record shall be compiled in accordance with the rules of the Arkansas Supreme Court and Court of Appeals.
(b) Transcript of Proceedings. On or before filing the notice of appeal, the appellant shall order from the reporter a transcript of such parts of the proceedings as he has designated in the notice of appeal. If the appellant intends to urge on appeal that a finding or conclusion is unsupported by the evidence or contrary thereto, he shall include in the record a transcript of all evidence relevant to such finding or conclusion. If the appellant has designated less than the entire record or proceeding, the appellee, if he deems a transcript of other parts of the proceedings to be necessary, shall, within ten (10) days after the filing of the notice of appeal, file and serve upon the appellant (and upon the court reporter if additional testimony is designated) a designation of the additional parts to be included. The appellant shall then direct the reporter to include in the transcript all testimony designated by appellee.
(c) Record to be Abbreviated. All matters not essential to the decision of the questions presented by the appeal shall be omitted. Formal parts of all exhibits and more than one copy of any document shall be excluded. Documents shall be abridged by omitting all irrelevant and formal portions thereof. For any infraction of this rule or for the unnecessary substitution by one party of evidence in question and answer form for a fair narrative statement proposed by another, the appellate court may withhold or impose costs as the circumstances of the case and discouragement of like conduct in the future may require; and costs may be imposed upon offending attorneys or parties. Where parties in good faith abbreviate the record by agreement or without objection from opposing parties, the appellate court shall not affirm or dismiss the appeal on account of any deficiency in the record without notice to appellant and reasonable opportunity to supply the deficiency. Where the record has been abbreviated by agreement or without objection from opposing parties, no presumption shall be indulged that the findings of the trial court are supported by any matter omitted from the record.
(d) Statement of the Evidence or Proceedings When No Report Was Made or the Transcript Is Unavailable. If no report of the evidence or proceedings at a hearing or trial was made, or if a transcript is unavailable, the appellant may prepare a statement of the evidence or proceedings from the best means available, including his recollection. The statement shall be served on the appellee, who may serve objections or proposed amendments thereto within ten (10) days after service upon him. Thereupon the statement and any objections or proposed amendments shall be submitted to the trial court for settlement and approval and as settled and approved shall be included by the clerk of the court in the record on appeal.
(e) Correction or Modification of the Record. If any difference arises as to whether the record truly discloses what occurred in the trial court, the difference shall be submitted to and settled by that court and the record made to conform to the truth. If anything material to either party is omitted from the record by error or accident or is misstated therein, the parties by stipulation, or the trial court, either before or after the record is transmitted to the appellate court, or the appellate court on proper suggestion, or on its own initiative, may direct that the omission or misstatement shall be corrected, and if necessary, that a supplemental record be certified and transmitted. All other questions as to form and content of the record shall be presented to the appellate court.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 6 (1995): This rule tracks former Appellate Rule 6 without change. The Reporter's Notes prepared in connection with former Appellate Rule 6 are set out below.
Reporter's Notes (as modified by the Court) to Rule 6: 1. Rule 6 combines and condenses a number of superseded Arkansas statutes, but makes no drastic changes in prior practice and procedure. Section (a) recognizes that the Arkansas Supreme Court has adopted extensive rules governing the contents and order of the record and defers such matter to the Supreme Court rules. Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2137.8 (Repl. 1962) is superseded in part by Section (a) of this rule.
2. Section (b) represents a combination of Rule 10(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 2127.3 (Repl. 1962). It requires the appellant to order the transcript at or before the filing of the notice of appeal (which under Rule 3 must contain a statement that such action has been taken). It also gives the appellee the right to require appellant to complete the transcript by filing a designation within ten days after the filing of the notice of appeal. This is in accord with superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2127.2 (Repl. 1962). As noted in Rule 3, appellant's notice of appeal must also contain a designation of the record; therefore, appellee's designation must be filed within ten days after the notice of appeal is filed. Section (b) makes no provision for adjustment of costs where the record is supplemented at the request of appellee. Normally, appellant bears the initial expense and the Supreme Court can thereafter make the proper adjustment of costs upon request of one of the parties.
3. Section (c) is copied from superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2127.6 (Repl. 1962).
4. Section (d) is lifted from Rule 10(c) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and is substantially the same as superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2127.11 (Repl. 1962). This section expressly provides that it applies not only where no record is made, but also where the record is unavailable. The superseded Arkansas statute did not contain this express language, although it was so construed. Arkansas State Hwy. Comm'n v. Clay, 241 Ark. 501, 408 S.W.2d 600 (1966).
5. Section (e) tracks superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2129.1 (Repl. 1962) and Rule 10 (e) of the Federal Rules. It works no changes in Arkansas practice or procedure.
Rule 7. CERTIFICATION AND TRANSMISSION OF RECORD
(a) Certification. The clerk of the trial court shall certify the record as being a true and correct copy of the record as designated by the parties.
(b) Transmission. After the record has been duly certified by the clerk of the trial court, it shall be the responsibility of the appellant to transmit such record to the clerk of the appellate court for filing and docketing.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 7 (1995): This rule tracks former Appellate Rule 7 without change. The Reporter's Notes prepared in connection with former Appellate Rule 7 are set out below.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 7: Rule 7 defines the duties of the clerk of the trial court and the appellant. It is the clerk's duty to certify the record and it is the duty of the appellant to transmit the record to the Arkansas Supreme Court. Superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2127.8 (Repl. 1962) required the court clerk to transmit the record to the Supreme Court, although the clerk seldom performed such duty. Generally, counsel for appellant assumed this responsibility under prior Arkansas law and this rule should have little effect on actual practice in Arkansas.
Rule 8. STAY PENDING APPEAL
(a) Supersedeas Defined; Necessity. A supersedeas is a written order commanding appellee to stay proceedings on the judgment, decree or order being appealed from and is necessary to stay such proceedings.
(b) Supersedeas; By Whom Issued. A supersedeas shall be issued by the clerk of the court which rendered the judgment, decree or order being appealed from unless the record has been lodged with the appellate court in which event the supersedeas shall be issued by the clerk of the appellate court.
(c) Supersedeas Bond. Whenever an appellant entitled thereto desires a stay on appeal, he shall present to the court for its approval a supersedeas bond which shall have such surety or sureties as the court requires. The bond shall be to the effect that appellant shall pay to appellee all costs and damages that shall be affirmed against appellant on appeal; or if appellant fails to prosecute the appeal to a final conclusion, or if such appeal shall for any cause be dismissed, that appellant shall satisfy and perform the judgment, decree or order of the trial court.
(d) Proceedings Against Sureties. If security is given in the form of a bond or other undertaking with one or more sureties, each surety submits himself to the jurisdiction of the trial court and irrevocably appoints the clerk of the trial court as his agent upon whom any papers affecting his liability on the bond or undertaking may be served. His liability may be enforced on motion in the trial court without the necessity of an independent action. The motion and such notice of the motion as the trial court prescribes shall be filed with the clerk of the trial court, who shall forthwith mail copies to the sureties if their addresses are known.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 8 (1995): This rule tracks former Appellate Rule 8 without change. The Reporter's Notes prepared in connection with former Appellate Rule 8 are set out below.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 8: 1. Rule 8 revises and consolidates prior Arkansas law concerning stays during appeal. Section (a) is a consolidation of superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 27-2119 and 27-2120 (Repl. 1962). It continues the requirement that a supersedeas be obtained in order to stay an appeal.
2. Section (b) permits the trial court clerk to issue a supersedeas up until the time the appeal has been docketed with the Arkansas Supreme Court. After such date, the supersedeas must be issued by the clerk of the Arkansas Supreme Court. Under superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. §§ 27-2122 and 27-2123 (Repl. 1962), a trial court clerk was limited to a period of thirty days following the entry of judgment within which to issue a supersedeas. Under Rule 8, the trial court clerk may issue a supersedeas until such time as the record is filed with the Arkansas Supreme Court.
3. Section (c) largely follows superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2121 (Repl. 1962) which was largely repealed by superseded Ark. Stat. Ann. § 27-2121.1 (Repl. 1962). No appreciable change in prior Arkansas law is effected by this section.
4. Section (d) is taken from Rule 8 (b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure and is generally in accord with prior Arkansas law.
Rule 9. TIME EXTENSION WHEN LAST DAY FOR ACTION FALLS ON SATURDAY, SUNDAY, OR HOLIDAY
Whenever the last day for taking any action under these rules or under the Rules of the Supreme Court and Court of Appeals falls on a Saturday, Sunday, or legal holiday, the time for such action shall be extended to the next business day.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 9 (1995): This rule is identical to former Appellate Rule 9.
Rule 10. UNIFORM PAPER SIZE
All notices of appeal, motions, orders, records, transcripts, and other papers required or authorized by these rules shall be on 8-1/2" x 11" paper.
Reporter's Notes to Rule 10 (1994): This rule is identical to former Appellate Rule 10.