From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Seaman

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 24, 1972
286 A.2d 509 (N.J. 1972)

Opinion

Argued December 21, 1971 —

Decided January 24, 1972.

Mr. Martin A. Spritzer appeared on behalf of the Middlesex County Ethics Committee, for the order.

Mr. Walter D. Van Riper appeared for the respondent.


Respondent stands convicted of misconduct in office, extortion and conspiracy to commit each of these crimes. He has been sentenced to State Prison for a term of 1-3 years and fined $5,000. The precise nature of the criminal activity is set forth in full detail in 114 N.J. Super. 19 (App.Div. 1971).

The circumstances of the case permit of no appropriate discipline short of disbarment.

The order of the Court is that the name of the respondent be stricken from the roll of attorneys.

For disbarment: Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and MOUNTAIN — 7.

Opposed: None.


Summaries of

In re Seaman

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jan 24, 1972
286 A.2d 509 (N.J. 1972)
Case details for

In re Seaman

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF JOSEPH J. SEAMAN, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jan 24, 1972

Citations

286 A.2d 509 (N.J. 1972)
286 A.2d 509

Citing Cases

Matter of Seaman

It is Ordered that the name of Joseph J. Seaman of Perth Amboy be stricken from the roll of attorneys at law.…

In re Persiano

See, e.g., In re Baldino, 105 N.J. 453 (1987) (attorney disbarred for conspiracy to commit official…