Summary
holding that "expenses" refers to "costs"
Summary of this case from World Peace Movement v. Newspaper AgencyOpinion
45257.
DECIDED APRIL 7, 1988.
Certiorari to the Court of Appeals of Georgia — 184 Ga. App. 846.
Franklin Taulbee, James B. Franklin, Allen, Brown Edenfield, Gerald M. Edenfield, Michael J. Classens, for appellant.
Oliver, Maner Gray, I. Gregory Hodges, Wendy Woods Williamson, for appellee.
We granted certiorari in In re Olliff, 184 Ga. App. 846 ( 363 S.E.2d 158) (1987), to determine whether Ms. Olliff was precluded as a matter of law from recovering her expenses and attorney fees incurred in her successful defense against a guardianship petition. Having heard the arguments and considered the record and briefs in this case, we agree with the Court of Appeals' opinion holding that "expenses" as used in OCGA § 29-5-13 (a) refers to "costs" incurred in a judicial proceeding brought under OCGA Ch. 29-5, rather than, as Ms. Olliff claimed, the expenses of litigation. Further, the statute is not subject to any of the infirmities claimed by Ms. Olliff. Accordingly, we affirm the Court of Appeals' opinion which, in turn, affirmed the trial court's denial of Ms. Olliff's application for expenses and attorney fees.
Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.