From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Merck Mumps Vaccine Antitrust Litig.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 27, 2023
Civil Action 12-3555 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 27, 2023)

Opinion

Civil Action 12-3555

07-27-2023

IN RE MERCK MUMPS VACCINE ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ALL ACTIONS


ORDER

CHAD F. KENNEY, JUDGE

AND NOW, this 27th day of July 2023, upon consideration of Defendant Merck's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 272) and Defendant Merck's Motion to Exclude Evidence from Dr. Thomas Copmann Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert (ECF No. 305), along with the responses and replies thereto, it is hereby ORDERED that for the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum:

1. Defendant Merck's Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 272) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. Judgment is ENTERED in favor of Defendant Merck on Count II (i.e., the NYDAPA and NJCFA claims), and therefore, Count II is DISMISSED IN FULL AND WITH PREJUDICE.

2. Defendant Merck's Motion to Exclude Evidence from Dr. Thomas Copmann Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 and Daubert (ECF No. 305) is DENIED.

3. The accompanying Memorandum shall remain under seal for seven days. Any party or non-party seeking to preclude public access to the accompanying Memorandum shall show particularized good cause in a memorandum not exceeding five pages to be filed no later than 12:00 p.m. on August 3, 2023 as to why the Court should preclude public access as to each word/line sought to be precluded from public access and shall email the underlying Memorandum with the proposed redactions to Chambers contemporaneous with filing the show cause memorandum.

See Avandia Mktg., Sales Pracs. & Prod. Liab. Litig., 924 F.3d 662 (3d Cir. 2019) (explaining that a party seeking to overcome the presumption of access to a judicial document bears the burden of showing “that the interest in secrecy outweighs the presumption” and that “the material is the kind of information that courts will protect and that disclosure will work a clearly defined and serious injury to the party seeking closure”); see also In re: Application of Storag Etzel GmbH for an Order, Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1782, to Obtain Discovery for Use in a Foreign Proceeding, No. 19-mc-209-CFC, 2020 WL 2949742 (D. Del. Mar. 25, 2020).


Summaries of

In re Merck Mumps Vaccine Antitrust Litig.

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Jul 27, 2023
Civil Action 12-3555 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 27, 2023)
Case details for

In re Merck Mumps Vaccine Antitrust Litig.

Case Details

Full title:IN RE MERCK MUMPS VACCINE ANTITRUST LITIGATION THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Jul 27, 2023

Citations

Civil Action 12-3555 (E.D. Pa. Jul. 27, 2023)