From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Liptak

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb 12, 2014
217 N.J. 18 (N.J. 2014)

Opinion

2014-02-12

In the Matter of Christine LIPTAK, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 015141992).


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision in DRB 13–154, concluding that CHRISTINE LIPTAK of MEBANE, NORTH CAROLINA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1992, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(d) and R. 1:21–6 (recordkeeping violations) and RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that CHRISTINE LIPTAK is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Liptak

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Feb 12, 2014
217 N.J. 18 (N.J. 2014)
Case details for

In re Liptak

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Christine LIPTAK, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Feb 12, 2014

Citations

217 N.J. 18 (N.J. 2014)
84 A.3d 261

Citing Cases

In re Tider

, In re Walcott, 217 N.J. 367 (2014) (attorney misrepresented to a third party, in writing, that he was…

In re Speck

, In re Walcott, 217 N.J. 367 (2014) (attorney misrepresented to a third party, in writing, that he was…