From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Leg. Conf. v. B. of High. Educ

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 29, 1972
293 N.E.2d 92 (N.Y. 1972)

Opinion

Argued November 29, 1972

Decided December 29, 1972

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ALFRED M. ASCIONE, J.

Alan F. Perl, Stephen H. Sturm and Daniel Meyer for appellant.

Norman Redlich, Corporation Counsel ( Mary P. Bass and Stanley Buchsbaum of counsel), for respondent.



Order affirmed, without costs. The offer of the Board as incorporated in the Appellate Division opinion appears to be a viable solution. Grievant would have one terminal year in the post of lecturer and the Board would be required to follow "established procedures" in re-evaluating the grievant. Thereupon, if grievant is found worthy of appointment to the faculty, benefits can be awarded to the grievant retroactively.

Concur: Chief Judge FULD and Judges BURKE, SCILEPPI, BERGAN, BREITEL, JASEN and GIBSON.


Summaries of

In re Leg. Conf. v. B. of High. Educ

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Dec 29, 1972
293 N.E.2d 92 (N.Y. 1972)
Case details for

In re Leg. Conf. v. B. of High. Educ

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of LEGISLATIVE CONFERENCE OF THE CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Dec 29, 1972

Citations

293 N.E.2d 92 (N.Y. 1972)
293 N.E.2d 92
340 N.Y.S.2d 924

Citing Cases

Matter of Anderson v. Bd. of Educ

ligible for tenure and recommend the appointment of those who qualify by objective standards ( Matter of…

Cohoes Schl. Dist. v. Tchrs. Assn

However, the grant of tenure to a teacher, involving the exercise of academic judgment, is a power vested…