From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Kaleb H.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 15, 2011
33 A.3d 739 (Conn. 2011)

Opinion

2011-12-15

In re KALEB H.

Dana M. Hrelic, Michael S. Taylor and Brendon P. Levesque, Hartford, in support of the petition. Stephen G. Vitelli, assistant attorney general in opposition.


Dana M. Hrelic, Michael S. Taylor and Brendon P. Levesque, Hartford, in support of the petition. Stephen G. Vitelli, assistant attorney general in opposition.

*740 The petition by the respondent mother for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 131 Conn.App. 829, 29 A.3d 173, is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly determine that the respondent mother failed to present sufficient factual allegations to raise reasonable doubt as to her competence?

“2. If the answer to question one is in the negative, does the same due process right to a competency evaluation that exists in termination of parental rights proceedings also attach to commitment proceedings?”


Summaries of

In re Kaleb H.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Dec 15, 2011
33 A.3d 739 (Conn. 2011)
Case details for

In re Kaleb H.

Case Details

Full title:In re KALEB H.

Court:Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Dec 15, 2011

Citations

33 A.3d 739 (Conn. 2011)
303 Conn. 916

Citing Cases

In re Kaleb H.

''2. If the answer to question one is in the negative, does the same due process right to a competency…

In re Kaleb H.

“2. If the answer to question one is in the negative, does the same due process right to a competency…