From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Holland

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 21, 2000
164 N.J. 246 (N.J. 2000)

Opinion

June 21, 2000.


ORDER

The Disciplinary Review Board having filed with the Court its decision concluding that ANTOINETTE HOLLAND of VOORHEES, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 1993, should be reprimanded for violating RPC 1.15(c) (failure to keep property that is in dispute until the dispute is resolved), RPC 3.4(c) (knowingly disobeying an obligation under the rules of tribunal), RPC 8.4(d) (conducted prejudicial to the administration of justice), and RPC 1.15(d) and Rule 1:21-6 (recordkeeping violations), and good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that ANTOINETTE HOLLAND is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs incurred in the prosecution of this matter.


Summaries of

In re Holland

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Jun 21, 2000
164 N.J. 246 (N.J. 2000)
Case details for

In re Holland

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF ANTOINETTE HOLLAND, AN ATTORNEY AT LAW

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Jun 21, 2000

Citations

164 N.J. 246 (N.J. 2000)
753 A.2d 648

Citing Cases

United States v. West

Id. (internal quotation marks omitted); see also New Jersey v. Farrad, 753 A.2d 648, 654 (N.J. 2000) (New…

State v. Samuels

If, for example, the defendant is apprehended before he reaches his robbery victim and thus before he has…