From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re H.L.A.D

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 25, 2008
362 N.C. 170 (N.C. 2008)

Summary

finding no prejudice from the petitioners' failure to attach the pertinent custody order to the petition when, inter alia, "there is also no indication that respondent[-mother] was unaware of [the juvenile]'s placement at any point during the case."

Summary of this case from Lowery v. B.R. & Unknown Father I.D.R

Opinion

No. 386A07.

Filed January 25, 2008.

Appeal pursuant to N.C.G.S. § 7A-30(2) from the decision of a divided panel of the Court of Appeals, 184 N.C. App. 381, 646 S.E.2d 425 (2007), affirming an order entered on 14 September 2006 by Judge Thomas G. Taylor in District Court, Gaston County. Heard in the Supreme Court on 10 December 2007.

Sofie W. Hosford for petitioner-appellees James R. Helms and Crystal Helms. Duncan B. McCormick for respondent-appellant father.


AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

In re H.L.A.D

Supreme Court of North Carolina
Jan 25, 2008
362 N.C. 170 (N.C. 2008)

finding no prejudice from the petitioners' failure to attach the pertinent custody order to the petition when, inter alia, "there is also no indication that respondent[-mother] was unaware of [the juvenile]'s placement at any point during the case."

Summary of this case from Lowery v. B.R. & Unknown Father I.D.R

stating children were in placement outside the home dating back to the entry of the initial nonsecure custody order

Summary of this case from In Matter of C.W.
Case details for

In re H.L.A.D

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF H.L.A.D

Court:Supreme Court of North Carolina

Date published: Jan 25, 2008

Citations

362 N.C. 170 (N.C. 2008)

Citing Cases

In re Teagan K.-O.

Both cases involved statutes vesting the state's court with " ‘exclusive original jurisdiction’ " over…

Whitworth v. Whitworth

The legislature has, in some instances, authorized the exercise of “continuing jurisdiction,” which is…