Summary
concluding that plaintiffs' claims for unpaid wages were non-core because they did not fall into any of the categories of core proceedings in 28 U.S.C. § 157(b) and did not arise in a bankruptcy case or under the Bankruptcy Code
Summary of this case from Quincy Med. Ctr., , Inc. v. GuptaOpinion
Case No. 1:10-cv00212-MPT, Bankr. D. Del. No. 07-10146-PJW.
May 4, 2011
Herbert Weiswasser Mondros, Margolis Edelstein, Wilmington, DE, Counsel for Plaintiffs.
James Edward Drnec, Balick Balick, LLC, Wilmington, DE, Counsel for Defendants, Third Party Plaintiffs.
Joanne P. Pinckney, Pinckney, Harris Weidinger, LLC, Wilmington, DE, Counsel for Third Party, Defendants.
Dear Counsel:
This is with respect to Magistrate Judge Thynge's May 2, 2011 Order directing this Court to address the core versus non-core issue. I would appreciate counsel agreeing to a schedule for the submission of briefs addressing the core versus non-core issue.