From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Chatterjee

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 4, 2014
217 N.J. 55 (N.J. 2014)

Opinion

2014-03-4

In the Matter of Suchis Mita CHATTERJEE, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No. 032572003).


ORDER

This matter have been duly presented to the Court pursuant to Rule 1:20–10(b), following the granting of a motion for discipline by consent in DRB 13–329 of SUCHIS MITA CHATTERJEE of PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA, who was admitted to the bar of this State in 2004;

And the District IV Ethics Committee and respondent having signed a stipulation of discipline by consent in which it was agreed that respondent violated RPC 8.4(c) (conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation);

And the parties having agreed that respondent's conduct violated RPC 8.4(c), and that said conduct warrants a reprimand or lessor discipline;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having determined that a reprimand is the appropriate discipline for respondent's unethical conduct and having granted the motion for discipline by consent in District Docket No. IV–2012–0026E;

And the Disciplinary Review Board having submitted the record of the proceedings to the Clerk of the Supreme Court for the entry of an order of discipline in accordance with Rule 1:20–16(e);

And good cause appearing;

It is ORDERED that SUCHIS MITA CHATTERJEE of PHILADELPHIA, PENNSYLVANIA is hereby reprimanded; and it is further

ORDERED that the entire record of this matter be made a permanent part of respondent's file as an attorney at law of this State; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent reimburse the Disciplinary Oversight Committee for appropriate administrative costs and actual expenses incurred in the prosecution of this matter, as provided in Rule 1:20–17.


Summaries of

In re Chatterjee

Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Mar 4, 2014
217 N.J. 55 (N.J. 2014)
Case details for

In re Chatterjee

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Suchis Mita CHATTERJEE, an Attorney at Law (Attorney No…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Date published: Mar 4, 2014

Citations

217 N.J. 55 (N.J. 2014)
85 A.3d 408

Citing Cases

In re Tider

, In re Walcott, 217 N.J. 367 (2014) (attorney misrepresented to a third party, in writing, that he was…

In re Speck

, In re Walcott, 217 N.J. 367 (2014) (attorney misrepresented to a third party, in writing, that he was…