From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Allmon

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Oct 21, 2016
792 S.E.2d 239 (S.C. 2016)

Opinion

Appellate Case Nos. 2016–000209 2016–000163

10-21-2016

In the Matter of Scott Christen Allmon, Petitioner.


ORDER

On May 22, 2013, the Court administratively suspended petitioner pursuant to Rule 419(d)(2) of the South Carolina Appellate Court Rules (SCACR). On January 15, 2014, the Court accepted an Agreement for Discipline by Consent entered into between petitioner and the Office of Disciplinary Counsel and suspended petitioner from the practice of law for one year retroactive to January 16, 2013, the date of petitioner's interim suspension. In the Matter of Allmon, 407 S.C. 24, 753 S.E.2d 544 (2014). Petitioner has now filed a Petition for Reinstatement pursuant to Rule 419(e), SCACR, and a Petition for Reinstatement pursuant to Rule 33 of the Rules for Lawyer Disciplinary Enforcement contained in Rule 413, SCACR.

After thorough consideration of the entire record, the Court grants both Petitions for Reinstatement.

s/Costa M. Pleicones, C.J.

s/John W. Kittredge, J.

s/Kaye G. Hearn, J.

We would deny both Petitions for Reinstatement.

s/Donald W. Beatty, J.

s/John Cannon Few, J.


Summaries of

In re Allmon

Supreme Court of South Carolina.
Oct 21, 2016
792 S.E.2d 239 (S.C. 2016)
Case details for

In re Allmon

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of Scott Christen Allmon, Petitioner.

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina.

Date published: Oct 21, 2016

Citations

792 S.E.2d 239 (S.C. 2016)
792 S.E.2d 239