From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyland v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Apr 19, 2012
Civil No. 11-1793 MJD/AJB (D. Minn. Apr. 19, 2012)

Summary

finding ALJ's analisis of the medical evidence flawed and unsubstantiated by the evidence of record, and that there were other factors bolstering Plaintiff's credibility, such as her work history

Summary of this case from Dugger v. Berryhill

Opinion

Civil No. 11-1793 MJD/AJB

04-19-2012

DAWN M. HYLAND, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant.


ORDER

Based upon the Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Recommendation by United States Magistrate Judge Arthur J. Boylan dated April 2, 2012, all the files and records, and no objections having been filed to said Recommendation,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 10] is GRANTED;
2. Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment [Docket No. 21] is DENIED;
3. Judgment to be entered accordingly.

______________________

Michael J. Davis

Chief Judge

U. S. District Court


Summaries of

Hyland v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA
Apr 19, 2012
Civil No. 11-1793 MJD/AJB (D. Minn. Apr. 19, 2012)

finding ALJ's analisis of the medical evidence flawed and unsubstantiated by the evidence of record, and that there were other factors bolstering Plaintiff's credibility, such as her work history

Summary of this case from Dugger v. Berryhill
Case details for

Hyland v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:DAWN M. HYLAND, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Date published: Apr 19, 2012

Citations

Civil No. 11-1793 MJD/AJB (D. Minn. Apr. 19, 2012)

Citing Cases

Dugger v. Berryhill

710207, at *14 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 22, 2011) (remanding with a directive to consider work history given the…