From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hyde v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 23, 2016
299 Ga. 135 (Ga. 2016)

Opinion

No. S16A0698.

05-23-2016

HYDE v. The STATE.

Hopton Hyde, Waycross, pro se. Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy Atty. Gen., Paula Khristian Smith, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Samuel S. Olens, Atty. Gen., Paul L. Howard, Jr., Dist. Atty., Paige Reese Whitaker, Marc A. Mallon, Asst. Dist. Attys., for appellee.


Hopton Hyde, Waycross, pro se.

Patricia B. Attaway Burton, Deputy Atty. Gen., Paula Khristian Smith, Sr. Asst. Atty. Gen., Samuel S. Olens, Atty. Gen., Paul L. Howard, Jr., Dist. Atty., Paige Reese Whitaker, Marc A. Mallon, Asst. Dist. Attys., for appellee.

Opinion

THOMPSON, Chief Justice. Appellant Hopton Hyde appeals from the trial court's denial of his motion to vacate an alleged void sentence of life without the possibility of parole. As the State concedes, the trial court erred in denying the motion. Accordingly, we reverse the trial court's judgment and remand the case with direction.

1. On February 1, 2000, a jury found appellant guilty of malice murder, aggravated assault, felony murder in the commission of aggravated assault, and possession of a knife during the commission of a crime. Under subsection (c) of Georgia's recidivist statute, OCGA § 17–10–7, the trial court sentenced appellant as a recidivist to life in prison without the possibility of parole for malice murder. We affirmed on direct appeal. See Hyde v. State, 275 Ga. 693, 572 S.E.2d 562 (2002). In May 2014, Hyde filed a pro se motion, contending that his sentence of life without the possibility of parole was void because the trial court, when it sentenced him, was not allowed by law to impose that sentence for murder. The trial court denied the motion, and appellant filed a timely appeal.

The felony murder verdict was vacated by operation of law, and trial court merged the remaining counts for sentencing purposes.

“[W]hen a court imposes a criminal punishment that the law does not allow, the sentence is not just an error, it is void.” Humphrey v. State, 297 Ga. 349, 350, 773 S.E.2d 760 (2015). An attack on a sentence on the ground that it imposed a punishment that the law does not allow “may be made at any time by means of a motion to vacate a void sentence.” Rooney v. State, 287 Ga. 1, 2, 690 S.E.2d 804 (2010). Here, in 2000, appellant was sentenced as a recidivist to life without the possibility of parole under subsection (c) of OCGA § 17–10–7 for a murder that he committed in 1999. At both of those times, however, OCGA § 17–10–7(c) did not allow recidivist punishment for capital felonies, of which malice murder is one. See Funderburk v. State, 276 Ga. 554, 555, 580 S.E.2d 234 (2003) (holding that the sentence of life without the possibility of parole that was imposed in 2000 on the defendant for malice murder was void because, at that time, OCGA § 17–10–7(c) did not apply to capital felonies such as murder). Accordingly, appellant's sentence of life without the possibility of parole is void, see Funderburk, 276 Ga. at 555, 580 S.E.2d 234, and the trial court erred in denying appellant's motion to vacate. We thus reverse the denial of the motion, vacate the sentence of life without parole, and remand for the imposition of a legal sentence.

Since 2000, “the General Assembly has amended subsection (c) to remove the exception for capital felonies. See OCGA § 17–10–7(c) (2013).” Grimes v. State, 293 Ga. 559, 563, n. 4, 748 S.E.2d 441 (2013). See also Ga. L. 2010, p. 563, § 1.

--------

Judgment reversed and case remanded with direction.

All the Justices concur.


Summaries of

Hyde v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia
May 23, 2016
299 Ga. 135 (Ga. 2016)
Case details for

Hyde v. State

Case Details

Full title:HYDE v. THE STATE.

Court:Supreme Court of Georgia

Date published: May 23, 2016

Citations

299 Ga. 135 (Ga. 2016)
786 S.E.2d 681

Citing Cases

Kimbrough v. State

As we have previously noted, in 2010 the General Assembly amended OCGA § 17–10–7 (c) to remove the exception…

Jackson v. State

As we have previously noted, in 2010 the General Assembly amended OCGA § 17-10-7 (c) to remove the exception…