From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hutchinson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Nov 22, 2022
6:22-cv-198-MAP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 22, 2022)

Opinion

6:22-cv-198-MAP

11-22-2022

CORI XIDES HUTCHINSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant.


ORDER

MARK A. PIZZO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Before me is Plaintiff's Uncontested Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 29). By the motion, Plaintiff seeks attorney's fees in the amount of $2,324 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).On September 2, 2022, I entered an Order reversing and remanding the case to the Commissioner of the Social Security Administration for further administrative proceedings (Doc. 27). Thereafter, the Clerk entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff (Doc. 28). As the prevailing party, Plaintiff now requests an award of attorney's fees. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A); cf. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 300-02 (1993) (concluding that a party who wins a sentence-four remand order under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) is a prevailing party).

Attorneys Richard A. Culbertson and Sarah P. Jacobs request fees at the hourly rate of $232.40 for 10 hours of work performed in 2022 (Doc. 29, at 2, 6, 10-11).

The plaintiff in a social security case has 30 days beyond the 60-day appeal window to apply for fees and other expenses under the EAJA, for a total of 90 days after judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(G); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); Gates v. Barnhart, 325 F.Supp.2d 1342, 1343 (M.D. Fla. 2002). In this case, Plaintiff timely filed her application for fees on November 21, 2022 (Doc. 29).

In Reeves v. Astrue, 526 F.3d 732 (11th Cir. 2008), the Eleventh Circuit held that an EAJA fee award is awarded to the “prevailing party,” not to counsel. In this case, Plaintiff has agreed to assign the EAJA award to her counsel (Doc. 29-1). The Commissioner does not oppose Plaintiff's motion. After issuance of an order awarding EAJA fees, however, the United States Department of the Treasury will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. If Plaintiff has no discernable federal debt, the government will accept Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees directly to Plaintiff's counsel. If she does, fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff's counsel to satisfy the debt. For the reasons set out in Plaintiff's motion, therefore, it is hereby

ORDERED:

1. Plaintiff's Uncontested Motion for Attorney Fees (Doc. 29) is GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff is awarded fees in the amount of $2,324. Unless the Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff owes a federal debt, the government must pay the fees to Plaintiff's counsel in accordance with Plaintiff's assignment of fees (Doc. 29-1).

DONE AND ORDERED


Summaries of

Hutchinson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

United States District Court, Middle District of Florida
Nov 22, 2022
6:22-cv-198-MAP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 22, 2022)
Case details for

Hutchinson v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.

Case Details

Full title:CORI XIDES HUTCHINSON, Plaintiff, v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY…

Court:United States District Court, Middle District of Florida

Date published: Nov 22, 2022

Citations

6:22-cv-198-MAP (M.D. Fla. Nov. 22, 2022)

Citing Cases

Ochmanski v. Kijakazi

Courts have approved comparable EAJA hourly rates. See Hallam v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 8:21-CV-3005-JSS,…

Antonelli v. Kijakazi

Courts have approved comparable EAJA hourly rates for work performed in 2022. See Hallam v. Comm'r of Soc.…