From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hurst v. Fla. Parole Prob. Comm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 25, 1982
418 So. 2d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Opinion

No. AK-90.

August 25, 1982.

Appeal from final agency action — Florida Parole and Probation Commission.

Appellant pro se.

Malcolm S. Greenfield, Gen. Counsel, Florida Parole and Probation Com'n, Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant's motion to dismiss has been treated as a motion to strike appellee's answer brief for failure to timely serve it. The action of the Florida Parole and Probation Commission is affirmed. See Britt v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 417 So.2d 1079 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Overfield v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 418 So.2d 321 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); and Lopez v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 410 So.2d 1354 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).

McCORD, MILLS and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hurst v. Fla. Parole Prob. Comm

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 25, 1982
418 So. 2d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)
Case details for

Hurst v. Fla. Parole Prob. Comm

Case Details

Full title:JERRY L. HURST, APPELLANT, v. FLORIDA PAROLE AND PROBATION COMMISSION…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 25, 1982

Citations

418 So. 2d 444 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1982)

Citing Cases

May v. Fla. Parole Probation Com'n

We have previously ruled adversely to this contention in several cases. See Overfield v. Florida Parole and…

Woulard v. Fla. Parole Prob. Com'n

I consider those four cases form the view that parole guidelines are subject to ex post facto prohibitions.…