From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hundley v. Skaff

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 18, 1993
9 F.3d 1106 (4th Cir. 1993)

Opinion

No. CA-92-53-5.

Argued November 30, 1992.

Decided November 18, 1993.

Daniel Foster Hedges, Charleston, WV, argued for plaintiffs-appellants.

Thomas R. Michael, Michael Kupec, Clarksburg, WV, on brief, for plaintiff-appellant Eaton.

Jan L. Fox, Deputy Atty. Gen., Charleston, WV, argued (Mario J. Palumbo, Atty. Gen., on brief), for defendants-appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia, at Beckley; Charles H. Haden, II, Chief District Judge.

Before WIDENER, PHILLIPS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.


OPINION


Having considered the record in this case and the briefs, and after oral argument, we are of opinion the decision of the district court should be affirmed.

Accordingly, we affirm on the opinion of the district court, Beasley v. Duncil, et al. (three cases), 792 F. Supp. 485 (S.D.W.Va. 1992).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Hundley v. Skaff

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Nov 18, 1993
9 F.3d 1106 (4th Cir. 1993)
Case details for

Hundley v. Skaff

Case Details

Full title:ELLA HUNDLEY; ANNETTE EATON, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. JOSEPH J. SKAFF…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Nov 18, 1993

Citations

9 F.3d 1106 (4th Cir. 1993)

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Elswick

This principle also applies to work release. See Beasley v. Duncil, 792 F.Supp. 485, 486-87 (S.D. W.Va.…

Jackson v. Elswick

The same applies to work release. See Beasley v. Duncil, 792 F.Supp. 485, 486-87 (S.D. W.Va. 1992), affd sub…