From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Huffman v. Allred

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01459-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. May. 29, 2012)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01459-CMA-KLM

05-29-2012

LORAL HUFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. DR. ALLRED, DR. CARTER, SANCHEZ, Case Manager, DERR, Unit Manager, JOHN DOE, Mailroom Supervisor, JANE DOE, Food Supervisor, BUCKNER, Investigator, LINCOLN, D.H.O., and CRANK, Trust Manager, Defendants.


MINUTE ORDER

ENTERED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE KRISTEN L. MIX

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Motion to Find BOP in Contempt of Court [Docket No. 220; Filed May 24, 2012] (the "Motion"). The federal Bureau of Prisons ("BOP") is not a party to this lawsuit, thus the Court has no authority to hold the BOP in contempt of court, assuming a legitimate basis to do so existed. Furthermore, Plaintiff does not identify a Defendant to whom his allegations are directed. The Court thus has no jurisdictional basis to evaluate the relief requested, in the absence of a named Defendant to whom the allegedly violative acts may be attributed. See Little v. Jones, 607 F.3d 1245, 1251 (10th Cir. 2010) (affirming the denial of a motion for preliminary injunction on the basis that the incarcerated pro se plaintiff had not "alleged that the defendants named in the complaint participated in the alleged deprivations . . . ."). Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Motion is DENIED.


Summaries of

Huffman v. Allred

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
May 29, 2012
Civil Action No. 11-cv-01459-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. May. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Huffman v. Allred

Case Details

Full title:LORAL HUFFMAN, Plaintiff, v. DR. ALLRED, DR. CARTER, SANCHEZ, Case…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: May 29, 2012

Citations

Civil Action No. 11-cv-01459-CMA-KLM (D. Colo. May. 29, 2012)