From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hudson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 19, 2022
331 So. 3d 1280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

No. 1D21-3034

01-19-2022

Brandon HUDSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Brandon Hudson, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.


Brandon Hudson, pro se, Petitioner.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits. See Topps v. State , 865 So. 2d 1253, 1258 (Fla. 2004) (explaining that a decision on an extraordinary writ petition that "clearly shows that the issue was considered by the court on the merits" is deemed a decision "which would later bar the litigant from presenting the issue under the doctrines of res judicata or collateral estoppel").

Roberts, Ray, and Nordby, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hudson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jan 19, 2022
331 So. 3d 1280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)
Case details for

Hudson v. State

Case Details

Full title:Brandon HUDSON, Petitioner, v. STATE of Florida, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jan 19, 2022

Citations

331 So. 3d 1280 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)