From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hough v. State

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Feb 11, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2011-196568 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2011-196568 Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-071

02-11-2015

Michael A. Hough, Respondent, v. State of South Carolina, Petitioner.

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Assistant Attorney General Brian T. Petrano, and Daniel Francis Gourley, II, all of Columbia, for Petitioner. Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek and Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, both of Columbia, for Respondent.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Kershaw County
James R. Barber, III, Circuit Court Judge

REVERSED

Attorney General Alan McCrory Wilson, Assistant Attorney General Brian T. Petrano, and Daniel Francis Gourley, II, all of Columbia, for Petitioner. Chief Appellate Defender Robert Michael Dudek and Appellate Defender Lara Mary Caudy, both of Columbia, for Respondent. PER CURIAM: Hough pled guilty to voluntary manslaughter, and the plea court sentenced him to twenty-three years' imprisonment. Following his plea, Hough filed for post-conviction relief (PCR), arguing ineffective assistance of counsel. The PCR court granted relief, and this court granted the State's petition for certiorari. The State argues the PCR court erred in finding trial counsel was deficient for failing to advise Hough of the possibility of an involuntary manslaughter jury charge. We reverse.

Involuntary manslaughter is defined as the unintentional killing of another without malice while engaged in either (1) the commission of some unlawful act not amounting to a felony and not naturally tending to cause death or great bodily harm, or (2) the doing of a lawful act with a reckless disregard for the safety of others.
State v. Sams, 410 S.C. 303, 309, 764 S.E.2d 511, 514 (2014) (emphasis added) (citing State v. Tucker, 324 S.C. 155, 170, 478 S.E.2d 260, 268 (1996)). It is a felony offense for a person who has been convicted of a crime of violence or a violent crime that is classified as a felony offense, to possess or acquire handguns within this state. S.C. Code Ann. § 16-23-30(B) (Supp. 2014); S.C. Code Ann. § 16-23-50(A)(1) (Supp. 2014); § 16-23-500 (Supp. 2014). Armed robbery is considered a violent crime and is a felony offense. S.C. Code Ann. § 16-1-60 (Supp. 2014); S.C. Code Ann. § 16-11-330(A) (2003). The PCR court failed to consider Hough's felonious act when it granted PCR. As a result, the PCR court erred as a matter of law when it determined Hough's case met the first definition of involuntary manslaughter. Under either version of the facts presented to the PCR court, it appears Hough would not have been entitled to the requested charge as he was a convicted felon in possession of a pistol. Because Hough has a prior conviction for armed robbery, him possessing a pistol, whether to rob the victim or sell him the gun, amounted to a felony precluding an involuntary manslaughter jury instruction. See State v. Reese, 370 S.C. 31, 36, 633 S.E.2d 898, 901 (2006), overruled on other ground by State v. Belcher, 385 S.C. 597, 685 S.E.2d 802 (2009) (reversing this court's holding that Reese was entitled to an involuntary manslaughter instruction; "Reese was pointing or presenting a firearm, a felony, which would preclude an involuntary manslaughter charge."); State v. Cabrera-Pena, 361 S.C. 372, 381, 605 S.E.2d 522, 526 (2004) ("Cabrera- Pena's conduct does not fit within the first definition of involuntary manslaughter because he was engaged in unlawful, felonious[,] and harmful conduct."). Accordingly, the PCR court's grant of PCR is REVERSED. HUFF and SHORT, JJ., and CURETON, A.J., concur.

The PCR court's order does not consider whether Hough met the second definition of involuntary manslaughter.


Summaries of

Hough v. State

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Feb 11, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2011-196568 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2015)
Case details for

Hough v. State

Case Details

Full title:Michael A. Hough, Respondent, v. State of South Carolina, Petitioner.

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Feb 11, 2015

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2011-196568 (S.C. Ct. App. Feb. 11, 2015)