From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hopps v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 25, 1988
520 So. 2d 673 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-780.

February 25, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Orange County, Joseph P. Baker, J.

Donald E. Christopher of Litchford, Christopher Milbrath, Orlando, for appellant.

Jack B. Nichols, P.A., Orlando, for appellees.


Based on Dickson v. Dunn, 399 So.2d 447 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981), we reverse the award of attorney's fees to appellees, Kip and Robin R. Smith. The lower court improperly determined that the litigation arose out of a contract for sale and purchase. In actuality, the cause of action asserted in this case was for alleged misrepresentation in the inducement of that contract. A misrepresentation action does not arise out of the contract itself; thus, there is no basis for an award of fees. See also Location 100, Inc. v. Gould S.E.L. Computer Systems, Inc., 517 So.2d 700 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Keys Lobster, Inc. v. Ocean Divers, Inc., 468 So.2d 360 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 480 So.2d 1295 (Fla. 1985). Accordingly, the judgment entered below is

REVERSED.

DAUKSCH and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hopps v. Smith

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Feb 25, 1988
520 So. 2d 673 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Hopps v. Smith

Case Details

Full title:HOWARD C. HOPPS, APPELLANT, v. KIP A. SMITH, ET AL., APPELLEES

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Feb 25, 1988

Citations

520 So. 2d 673 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Van Der Noord v. Katz

See Hyman v. Cohen, 73 So.2d 393 (Fla. 1954); Bliss and Laughlin Industries, Inc. v. Malley, 364 So.2d 65…

Pharmacy Management Serv. v. Perschon

The appellant first points out, correctly, that a cause of action for alleged misrepresentation in the…