Summary
finding an employee manual admissible under Rule 803
Summary of this case from Johnson v. Salt Lake City Sch. Dist.Opinion
CV 07-555-PK.
January 16, 2008
ORDER
Magistrate Judge Paul Papak issued Findings and Recommendation (#51) on December 12, 2007, in which he recommended this Court grant in part and deny in part Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (#41); grant Defendants Calvin-Smith, Darcy, and Pathfinders' Motion for Summary Judgment (#22) as to each of Plaintiff's claims; and grant Defendants Jeske, Brown, and Martin's (State Defendants) Motion for Summary Judgment (#28) as to each of Plaintiff's claims. The matter is now before this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b).
Because no objections to the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation were timely filed, this Court is relieved of its obligation to review the record de novo. Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). See also Lorin Corp. v. Goto Co., 700 F.2d 1202, 1206 (8th Cir. 1983). Having reviewed the legal principles de novo, the Court does not find any error.
CONCLUSION
The Court ADOPTS Magistrate Judge Papak's Findings and Recommendation (#51). Accordingly, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Plaintiff's Motion to Strike (#41) as set out in the Findings and Recommendation; GRANTS Defendants Calvin-Smith, Darcy, and Pathfinders' Motion for Summary Judgment (#22) as to each of Plaintiff's claims; and GRANTS State Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (#28) as to each of Plaintiff's claims.
IT IS SO ORDERED.