Hoeft v. State

Full title: Galyn Scott HOEFT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Court: District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

Date published: Dec 2, 2022

351 So. 3d 666 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2022)

Opinion

Case No. 5D22-1572

12-02-2022

Galyn Scott HOEFT, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Matthew J. Metz, Public Defender, and Edward J. Weiss, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.

Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Richard A. Pallas, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.

PER CURIAM. In this Anders ¹ appeal, we affirm the judgments and sentences entered below but remand for entry of a written order revoking probation in Case No. 2022-MM-111. See Patt v. State , 876 So. 2d 1278, 1278 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004) (holding that order revoking probation must state in writing conditions which trial court found to have been violated).

1 Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967).

AFFIRMED; REMANDED for entry of a written order revoking probation.

EVANDER, EISNAUGLE and HARRIS, JJ., concur.