From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 17, 1981
393 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Opinion

No. 79-873.

February 17, 1981.

Appeal from Circuit Court, Dade County; Herbert Stettin, Judge.

Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Bruce A. Rosenthal, Asst. Public Defender and David Kreider, Legal Intern, for appellant.

Jim Smith, Atty. Gen. and Paul Mendelson, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee.

Before HUBBART, C.J., and SCHWARTZ and BASKIN, JJ.


The appellant's robbery conviction is reversed for a new trial because the trial judge erroneously denied a requested instruction that intent to deprive is an essential element of the crime. Bell v. State, 394 So.2d 979 (Fla. 1981).


Summaries of

Hodge v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District
Feb 17, 1981
393 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)
Case details for

Hodge v. State

Case Details

Full title:ANDREW HODGE, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District

Date published: Feb 17, 1981

Citations

393 So. 2d 1188 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1981)

Citing Cases

Worthey v. State

Section 924.33, Florida Statutes (1979); James v. State, 393 So.2d 1138 (Fla. 3d DCA 1981); Bolen v. State,…

Williams v. State

See Bolen v. State, supra. While a harmless error obviously cannot be fundamental, so that these decisions…